CBB front page of Sunday People- Jim interview!
 

Jim interview in today's Sunday people :)

He is lapping it up while he can and intent on makinge as much money from it as he can - it won't last, and he knows it.

It's not exactly a positive interview. Most of it is quoting some stuff he said two years ago and another lot of it is pretty negative stuff as well .

Is there a reason for him to go into hiding? The same can be said for Luisa and Jasmine can you blame them for trying to cash in?

Yeah you can read it here: http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/j...1#.Uu48sfl_uvg

Real hatchet job of an article, they call it an 'exclusive' when the whole thing is quotes that he made "at Tory bastion The Carlton Club in London’s Mayfair in 2011"

[QUOTE=MTVN;6683799]Yeah you can read it here: http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/j...1#.Uu48sfl_uvg

Real hatchet job of an article, they call it an 'exclusive' when the whole thing is quotes that he made "at Tory bastion The Carlton Club in London’s Mayfair in 2011"[/QUOTE


I'm sure his ex wife story was in the People as well didn't know the paper still existed!

I think the journalist may have been slighty pissed off when he said "It’s been superb – much better than *window-cleaning and even journalism" hence the scathing article LOL.

To be fair he did say all those things, I agree it should be about his experience and winning CBB but some people pardon the pun wont just wipe his past clean like a BB fan. This is the press, what do you expect? They dig up dirt on everyone.

I agree with him on people being to PC 100% but he has to understand if hes making jokes about people with Down Syndrome he should expect to get into sh!t. Not everyone gets away with these comments as hes implying he is slightly playing the victim.

Remember Frankie Boyle got into trouble over jokes about disabled people and major trouble over joking about Katie Price' son Harveys disability.

He is doing the exact same as every other BB finalist and winner.

I thought it was funny.. Someone was talking about "reverse sexism" the other day, but they were being serious. It was still funny though. :laugh:

I didn't say he wasn't. I just feel that for someone with an OBE it is pretty desperate. Good luck to him - but he is hardly likely to be starting off a whole new career. He has had his day, there are better around now and he is making the best of his last chance at being in the limelight.

Just a 'private' joke!

But this is nothing to do with him keeping himself in the limelight, the Sunday People piece is entirely based on things he said in an interview over two years ago, Jim can't exactly do much about them suddenly turning that into a front page story now

Oh yeah lol theres no such thing as reverse sexism its just SEXISM lol.

The Daily Mirror, left wing, Jim Davidson, right wing. Hardly surprising they would dig this up. Nothing new or remotely surprising about him in the article either. Does this paper think Google doesn't exist? Or are we all supposed to be too young or blinkered to already know about him?:conf:
GLAD to see him knocking the odious , unfunny creeps Boyle and Carr! How refreshing, and the only surprise in the article. Was it jealousy? I hope not.
I see he has a Channel 5 one off "in depth interview"show coming up with the incisive interviewer Emma Willis. She'll inanely giggle and shriek ( a lot )and he'll walk all over her.

there is such a thing youre simply in denial

There's such a thing as reverse ignorance :laugh:
I'm glad it wasn't blowing smoke up his butt, far too many have done that already... So he managed to keep a lid on his prejudiced views in the house? whoopee! give the man a prize!.... Oh, you did :/

Would you rather he behaved more like jasmine and luisa ? class act them too
but if he was caught putting his hand down a girls dress to fondle her you would be spitting blood but being woman they are aloud to act in this way what do your mob call it 'empowerment''

No such thing.

You know what he means when he says it so why make such an issue of it debating your view point is what this site is all about but nit picking on something you fully understand is childish


you do it with the spelling of luisa claiming its not louisa even know its louisa
look at the documents of her cup cake business for proof

The bit at the end of the interview where he's on about people calling him racist and bigoted because of his act is spot on. People go to watch him, take what he's saying as his own opinion and clap and applaud it. They're the bigots, not him.
I watched him on Youtube the other day and yeah some of his jokes were a bit near the knuckle and he was absolutely vile about some members of the audience but nine times out of ten he's actually taking the piss out of people who ARE racist.
Can I also say that I've never understood the term Shirt Lifter...? I'm gay and I don't get why it's offensive. Surely straight people lift shrts to get to where they need to in the bedroom too...? :conf2:

You see!...this is exactly why I do not buy newspapers!!...It is a shiny example of the [so called] journalist's clear disdain toward the interviewee! ...A hatchet Job isn't enough to cover what this rank-amateurish hack with their own biased slant on political correctness has just done to a clearly well supported old comic that has just won a public popularity contest!....This is what's wrong with journalism today....a journalist should tell the story as it is without trying to force their own opinions and pc values on the general public!!

It was a sham of an article....someone should be sacked for unprofessional behaviour! :fist:

There really isn't lol :conf: sexism is against EITHER gender, not just one. Reverse sexism is non terminology.

I have no idea what the poster means, reverse sexism isn't a thing lol I have asked the poster to explain what it is in a previous post but just got a "you're in denial" answer.

Now that's childish.

:spin:

So within the context he was referring to reverse sexism you could not workout he means woman being sexist towards men ?


would you know what positive discrimination is? After all discrimination is discrimination