ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   South Wales : The Dog ate my Baby's head (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=246828)

arista 18-02-2014 10:01 PM

South Wales : The Dog ate my Baby's head
 
['The dog ate my baby's head!': Horrific screams
of mother after her 6 day old baby
girl is mauled to death by family's
pet at their home in south Wales
Sharon John, 42, wept to her neighbours
after her six-day-old girl - named locally
as Eliza-Mae Martha Mullane - was found
dead next to family pet
The dog seized from the property
was an Alaskan Malamut
Dyfed Powys Police are investigating
the death in Pontyberem
Alaskan Malamutes were originally
bred as sled dogs for work in the Arctic
The dog, similar to a husky,
is not a banned breed]

http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-329x437.jpg


http://media.skynews.com/media/image...-1-329x437.jpg


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz2tiXZqyUi


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/...75_634x383.jpg


shocking and sad

HD 18-02-2014 10:02 PM

oh my god

Jake. 18-02-2014 10:03 PM

another family too trusting of their pet, such a sad loss.

When will people learn that dogs, like any animals, can turn?

Benjamin 18-02-2014 10:05 PM

I'm sure this is old news, I recognise the childs name and the story?

Kazanne 18-02-2014 10:07 PM

This baby was 6 days old,she had spent 3 of them in intensive care,I heard they had seized the dog pending a post mortem,surely you would not leave a vunerable baby alone for one second let alone with a dog ,or am I being inreasonable?

LaLaLand 18-02-2014 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne (Post 6719159)
This baby was 6 days old,she had spent 3 of them in intensive care,I heard they had seized the dog pending a post mortem,surely you would not leave a vunerable baby alone for one second let alone with a dog ,or am I being inreasonable?

EXACTLY! I don't blame the dog for one moment though, it's just sheer irresponsibility.

arista 18-02-2014 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Benjamin (Post 6719148)
I'm sure this is old news, I recognise the childs name and the story?


No


They are Tomorrows papers

Gstar 18-02-2014 10:16 PM

this is horrible. my niece is two weeks old tomorrow and I wouldn't even let a goldfish near her

Nedusa 18-02-2014 10:29 PM

Utterly avoidable .... The adults in this case should be charged with causing death by dangerous dog(s)...!!!!

Ramsay 18-02-2014 10:31 PM

Ridiculous parenting. How could anyone leave a 6 day old baby on its own? let alone with a ****ing dog?

Nedusa 18-02-2014 10:33 PM

If you knowingly, willingly and stupidly allow large dogs access to babies and young children and leave them unattended then if the child/baby is killed then there should be a charge of causing death by dangerous dog and it should carry a min of 7 years in jail ...

This sort of tragedy is so avoidable ....!!!!!

Z 18-02-2014 10:34 PM

Brutal :/

Vicky. 18-02-2014 10:37 PM

The stream of idiotic parenting never ends it seems...poor girl :(

joeysteele 18-02-2014 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne (Post 6719159)
This baby was 6 days old,she had spent 3 of them in intensive care,I heard they had seized the dog pending a post mortem,surely you would not leave a vunerable baby alone for one second let alone with a dog ,or am I being inreasonable?

Not unreasonable in any shape or form Kazanne, you are totally spot on.

GypsyGoth 18-02-2014 10:47 PM

:sad:

Mystic Mock 18-02-2014 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jake. (Post 6719142)
another family too trusting of their pet, such a sad loss.

When will people learn that dogs, like any animals, can turn?

Tbf parents should be allowed to have pets without them killing their child, it's just that these parents was irresponsible by leaving them on their own.

Kazanne 18-02-2014 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele (Post 6719263)
Not unreasonable in any shape or form Kazanne, you are totally spot on.

Thanks Joey,I just cannot understand how she could have been left like that,and its horrific what happened but do the press really have to print headlines like the dog ate her head!!! it annoys me ,the dog bit her head apparently (not ate it) she may have startled the dog,a sad outcome for the baby and the dog ,her parents must take some responsibility.

Jake. 18-02-2014 10:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Mockinator (Post 6719282)
Tbf parents should be allowed to have pets without them killing their child, it's just that these parents was irresponsible by leaving them on their own.

Sorry but any parent trusting their animal with a baby of 6 days is an idiot, I didn't say that parents shouldn't have pets though

Ninastar 18-02-2014 10:55 PM

when will people ****ing learn not to leave babies alone with ANY animals. even cats can kill babies. they sleep on their bodies for warmth and sometimes babies suffocate. how can such dumb ****ing idiots have kids? it's actually depressing

joeysteele 18-02-2014 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kazanne (Post 6719286)
Thanks Joey,I just cannot understand how she could have been left like that,and its horrific what happened but do the press really have to print headlines like the dog ate her head!!! it annoys me ,the dog bit her head apparently (not ate it) she may have startled the dog,a sad outcome for the baby and the dog ,her parents must take some responsibility.

They have to of course, especially one of this size,however size doesn't matter.
Dogs can turn in a moment,if startled or when being pestered,even a dog sleeping then woken suddenly by a cry can make it snap.
To have the dog anywhere near where this child was is sheer neglect in my view.

I have a dog, he has never gone for anyone and is great around children,I however would never leave him unattended with any child,in fact I wouldn't leave him around any stranger to him either.
You just never know what may trigger them to attack for some reason.
Better to be safe than sorry,no matter how docile anyone may think their dog is.

Kazanne 18-02-2014 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele (Post 6719312)
They have to of course, especially one of this size,however size doesn't matter.
Dogs can turn in a moment,if startled or when being pestered,even a dog sleeping then woken suddenly by a cry can make it snap.
To have the dog anywhere near where this child was is sheer neglect in my view.

I have a dog, he has never gone for anyone and is great around children,I however would never leave him unattended with any child,in fact I wouldn't leave him around any stranger to him either.
You just never know what may trigger them to attack for some reason.
Better to be safe than sorry,no matter how docile anyone may think their dog is.

Spot on Joey I have two dogs and children ,I have a king Charles Cavalier and a Pommie cross,both as docile as anything,my kids play with them all the time,but never while they are alone ,as you said best to be safe than sorry,I certainly wouldnt leave a tiny newborn as ,as someone has said even cats can kill newborns.

lostalex 19-02-2014 08:23 AM

am i the only one that immediately thought "the dingo ate my baby"?

user104658 19-02-2014 08:38 AM

Leaving them alone is almost irrelevant: a dog can kill a child in seconds whether you're there or not. There was a news story recently, about a dog entering a room while the mother was right next to her daughter at her bed, and the dog still managed to kill the child. They are strong animals with strong jaws - once they bite down even a large adult might be unable to stop them. Or they could kill before an adult even has time to run across a room.

Dogs are safe pets because they are pack animals and because they recognise that they are further down the pecking order than the humans in the house and because the humans have safe predictable ways of interactive with them. Babies and toddlers are new to them, and they are inherently unpredictable in their actions. they might hug a dog - they might yank on its tail, or scream in its face. They make them nervous, and a nervous dog (ANY nervous dog) is a dangerous dog. My friends mum was badly bitten (chunk out of her arm) by her gentle, playful, never-hurt-a-fly Labrador that she'd had for 7 years because his little cousin had wound the dog up to breaking point. It was very sorry afterwards, but in that second, it still happened, and if it had been a child's neck it would have been another news story.

Dogs and small children don't mix. Period. Most of the time they'll probably make it though those early years just fine and be best of friends, yes. When a child is old enough to interact with a dog properly, having one as a pet is a wonderful experience. But, the RISK with little babies and toddlers is just too grave. A dog is not your friend, your confidant or your child. it is an animal with very sharp teeth. People humanize them and forget this, they believe that the dog loves them and cares for them... in the way that a person does.

If you're having a baby, the dog has to go. It's the only way to be "safe".

Kazanne 19-02-2014 08:41 AM

I've been reading this morning that it's not actually confimed it was the dog,although it's looks like it will be,wonder why they are not sure?

Nedusa 19-02-2014 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 6719930)
Leaving them alone is almost irrelevant: a dog can kill a child in seconds whether you're there or not. There was a news story recently, about a dog entering a room while the mother was right next to her daughter at her bed, and the dog still managed to kill the child. They are strong animals with strong jaws - once they bite down even a large adult might be unable to stop them. Or they could kill before an adult even has time to run across a room.

Dogs are safe pets because they are pack animals and because they recognise that they are further down the pecking order than the humans in the house and because the humans have safe predictable ways of interactive with them. Babies and toddlers are new to them, and they are inherently unpredictable in their actions. they might hug a dog - they might yank on its tail, or scream in its face. They make them nervous, and a nervous dog (ANY nervous dog) is a dangerous dog. My friends mum was badly bitten (chunk out of her arm) by her gentle, playful, never-hurt-a-fly Labrador that she'd had for 7 years because his little cousin had wound the dog up to breaking point. It was very sorry afterwards, but in that second, it still happened, and if it had been a child's neck it would have been another news story.

Dogs and small children don't mix. Period. Most of the time they'll probably make it though those early years just fine and be best of friends, yes. When a child is old enough to interact with a dog properly, having one as a pet is a wonderful experience. But, the RISK with little babies and toddlers is just too grave. A dog is not your friend, your confidant or your child. it is an animal with very sharp teeth. People humanize them and forget this, they believe that the dog loves them and cares for them... in the way that a person does.

If you're having a baby, the dog has to go. It's the only way to be "safe".

Excellent Post....!!!!

Says it all. ... Animals and small children/Babies don't mix .. Period !!


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.