Why the overreaction to being nominated?
 

This year is particular has been really bad for it, do most of them think themselves to be untouchable?

Mark

because they're hypersensitive media types who take any form of obstruction to their long and tiresome path to 'fame' like an inoperable tumour

Ash has been the worst.

But don't you realize that Ash is a True Entertainer? How could anyone dare nominate him even though he only properly speaks to three people. And why would anyone nominate Steven when he's delivering so much. WHAT ARE THESE PEOPLE THINKING

You'd think they'd have gotten used to it by now :laugh:

I mean, Big Brother has only been on fifteen years...

Helen sitting telling the rest who she doesn't want nominated ,you couldn't make this **** up .

Love the sarcasm:laugh:

He really does have an ego.

I am not understanding tonight at all, why do all of the nominees feel they are owed an explanation?!

Helen has Hysteria about nominations. I'd tell her to BOG OFF it's part of the show.

I get headaches watching episodes surrounding nominations.

They are all incredibly stupid and dull. Steven, Ash, Helen, even Mark... all of them take nominations like it's not a part of the show, a voluntary thing that can just happen if someone else chooses.. I find it nauseating that they think they deserve to be in the final.

So far up their own arses it's not even entertaining. As each week goes I'm nearing more and more to the switch off button.

..because I think the house has been so relentless and heightened with emotions/arguments this year and their focus has been on that, that they haven't had time to take stock and realise there is a game attached to it as well..they're just focused on trying to keep the peace and in doing that, feeling good about it and as bonded as they can be, they're then slighted when they're nominated and can't believe it....