Ash and Matthew argued at the after-party over Helen
 

http://metro.co.uk/2014/08/16/big-br...helen-4835269/

Inevitable

Matthew is so bitter

helen can look after herself, she doesnt need him to argue and be immature about it they all should forget about it and just have a good time

I take it you include Matthew in that comment?

Hope he clocked Ash

nope because matthew did not start the argument he just slagged helen off who helen can defend herself, ash should let him have his opinions and have a good time, im not even a matthew fan

Well the person who made his experience a misery won :umm2:

I think Ash is a gentleman for letting Helen enjoy her win and putting that horrible cretin Matthew in his place.

He and Toya have made utter fools of themselves since they were booted out.

It didn't make his experience a misery though as he said in his reflection article that it was one of the best experiences of his life and he goes on and on about the argument he had with her. He calls it 'the most controversial moment of the series' and is so hung up on it as he always posts 'Always in the right', uses it when he calls into BOTS and has it in his bio...it's his ticket to still being relevant.

ash should just be a adult and ignore matthew and have a good time

He shouldnt have been such a judgemental prick then should he. If he is going to sit around judging others he was more than due some home truths himself.

Helen was far worse in that argument even most Helen stans see that

Ash is a complete moron. Helen treated certain people like utter ****, it's reasonable that some of them will dislike her. He acts like she's a poor, innocent little victim who's receiving criticism for no reason.

Also, he slagged people off enough, along with Saint Helen. Why is it automatically a terrible thing when they're on the receiving end?

Actually, Ash sat there and goaded Helen as she mocked Jale about "the slug's elephant ears", so his attitude towards Matthew and Jale for slagging them off is almost comical.

Why should he sit by and watch a bitter little tosser slag his friend off?

If he hadn't sat there slagging people off himself and being generally nastu for no reason, he might have a right to be offended by the idea of slagging someone off.

As it stands, he doesn't. He and Helen have dished out enough poison, they should be big enough to take some back.

He put himself in the situation and wound her up. His own fault.

The sooner Matthew disappears back into irrelevance the better, he never said anything of substance on the show, nor since he's been evicted, about time someone said something to him

He was justified when Helen threw all the insults under the sun at him in the haus

Helen went OTT, you condone someone being called a pigeon chested twat, c unt etc

Sssssh, don't involve facts. Some people are trying to conveniently forget certain events to back up their arguments. :laugh2:

He said just as much back and has repeated himself since, at least Helen moved on. He is bitter and that is all this runs down to.

So you condone him repeatedly making fun of Helens apperance since he got booted out?

What facts have been missed?

Haven't read most of his twitter

It takes two to tango after all