Game over - still bullying & vile
 

Can all those on here who took me (and others) to task for being"too serious" in accusing James, Dee, Edele, Ricci and George of being vile bullies to Gary Busey, because it was only "a game", explain, why then, when the 'game' was over and the show ended, they all continued to slag the poor guy off and humiliated him in front of his wife and family? The ignorance displayed by that fat, guttersnipe, thieving parasite, Truffle Pig Dee Kelly, whilst Gary was being interviewed was shameful, as was the 'sour grapes' sniping by James 'I dance in the closet' Jordan.

The best man won and the right man came second.

Dee needs to shut her big mouth and think why the public voted her out and Gary and Audley in 1st and 2nd place.

This from a woman who stole money from a care home to fund her boyfriends drug habit.

She should look at her own low standards before throwing stones.

Get back in the gutter Dee, it is where you belong.

That's where she should be in the gutter.

This forum has been much more vile than any of the housemates. All I've heard for the last 3 weeks is disgusting comments about the housemates that are disliked. Kelly the bad ******, dee the fat sponger, and James the obvious homosexual. It's so easy to be vile behind the safety of your anonymity. All I can conclude is that the majority of you are daily star reading 12 year olds.

Awful I know, totally agree.

To be a part of it is to condone it and my exit is long overdue

^ it happens every series unfortunately, but please don't let the unpleasant vocal minority put you off the forum.

"This forum has been much more vile than any of the housemates. All I've heard for the last 3 weeks is disgusting comments about the housemates that are disliked." --- The house-mates in question are disliked by the majority for valid reasons - their vile mistreatment and humiliation as a 'pack', of a defenceless, disabled and benign, solitary old man, as well as the abhorrent character traits they all personally shared; hypocrisy, lying and duplicity, to name a few.

They have been vile. This transcended any 'brinkmanship' or mischievous 'game-playing', it is in their nature. It is 'them', and being so, they have elicited anger and disgust in the majority of people who watched the show. Extreme action be-gets extreme reaction. If, I for one, have been vile and caustic in my comments about these turds, I make no apology, and the fact that they continued to conduct themselves in the same malevolent manner after the show had ended, reinforces my belief that I have nothing to apologise for. Where were their apologies to Gary Busey or Audley?

"It's so easy to be vile behind the safety of your anonymity." --- I only wish that I could have been in the house, because I would have stood up to these bullies, helped protect Gary Busey and supported Audley, and - unlike the vile scum you are defending - I would have repeated anything I have had to say about them to their face.

"All I can conclude is that the majority of you are daily star reading 12 year olds.!" --- I've never bought the Daily Star in my life - but I have a strong feeling it's the rag which Dee Kelley and a few of her cronies in the house might favour.

Those who elect to appear on these type of 'Reality' TV shows, do so for fame, fat fees, and other fortunes. By doing so, they become 'fair game' for those whose participation as viewers, ultimately pay for those 'fat fees'. If they choose to be vile and obnoxious during the time they are 'on show' to the viewing public, then they cannot complain when the viewers who are offended by that vile, obnoxious behaviour, become vile or obnoxious in their reactions. THEY are deserving of it, Gary Busey was not.

This post has been written by me by way of answering the points raised in Chuckyeggs post - it is my opinion, right or wrong, and is not meant to cause offence to any other forum member.

You have no right to call anyone a bully when you're here bullying them now

I have to agree.

:clap1::clap1::clap1::clap1::clap1:

Yh

It felt like it was only acceptable to stan Gary and if any housemate went against him it was a sinful act

????? I am bullying them now? I have read your other posts in which you defend James & co. and refuse to see anything wrong in their utterly cowardly bullying behaviour - that, to me, is real reassurance, when you now perceive me to be a bully, that I am anything but. Thank you. :wavey:

No, you're absolutely right, none of us Gary/Audley supporters (the MAJORITY OF THIS FORUM)have ever let the unpleasant vocal minority put us off the forum - we're still here and still vocal. :wavey:

Frenchy fans made up the majority of the forum tbh

Because 'The ignorance displayed by that fat, guttersnipe, thieving parasite, Truffle Pig Dee Kelly, whilst Gary was being interviewed was shameful, as was the 'sour grapes' sniping by James 'I dance in the closet' Jordan. ' is pleasant.

Please tell me then, whether you continued watching CBB14 after the first 4 days , when it became very apparent that the majority of the house were unashamedly ill-treating a disabled, helpless old man? Or did you exit so that you were not a part of it and were therefore not condoning it?

Interesting when viewed from different perspectives. As a Gary fan, I saw a huge number of threads and posts filled with nasty vitriol directed at Gary. It seemed the depths people would go to knew no limits.

I think its a general problem that people can get carried away when they invest so much time into following the show

True and fair. :wavey:

???? Are you in agreement now? Thank you. :wavey: There is a gulf of difference between merited 'arms length' unpleasantness and ridicule in a critical post of 'celebrities' at large in the big wide world, who have the option of reading that post or not, than the 'hands on' unwarranted callous hostilty, ignorance and bullying of a 70 year old disabled man who is trapped for 3 weeks in the same small house as the perpetrators.

True but the majority on here and voting were Gary fans

and was probably typical of the voter distribution in the final :shrug:

As a Gary fan, I've never said he is perfect. I'm sure some of the issues brought up by other housemates had at least *some* truth to them.

However,

I found that in many cases, they were exaggerating, and sometimes outright lying, as when Dee denied calling Gary a bitter old man.

I fully understand that some of Gary's habits may have been hard to live with... but I still say when someone is that age, has had a brain injury and several surgeries, has a profound hearing problem, the best thing you can do for them is CUT THEM SOME SLACK. Life is difficult enough for someone in that condition. They don't need a bunch of heartless, selfish, immature and verbally abusive people getting on their case, ON TOP OF what they already have to deal with on a daily basis.

It's called understanding and compassion, people.

Elderly people sometimes lose control of their bodily functions. It comes with age. YOUR body will deteriorate over time, as well... Everyone's eventually does, and I can bet that at that time, you will want people to be understanding of what you're going through.

Gary took everything people said on board, and tried to meet their requirements. He clearly tried to make improvements once an issue was made clear to him.

Conversely, do you think for one moment that James would try to NOT act so pompous and better than everyone else, if he were asked to do so?

Do you think Dee would take criticism on board and try to change if she were told what was wrong with her? HELL NO.

Do you think "poor little" Leslie could be told all the things he does wrong, and then learn to appreciate the feedback and use it to improve himself?

Gary is MILES ahead of the rest of them, as far as self-awareness goes. And he's humble, not a braggart like the rest of them. He doesn't pretend to be better than the rest of them, but nearly all of them pretend to be better than him.

As I mentioned in another thread, just look at the way he spoke lovely things about all of them, even though they've done nothing but complain about him, call him every name in the book, and slag him off in every way possible. That's the difference between someone with class, and someone who needs to attend a few (classes).

The right person won CBB Summer 2014. If you don't like that fact, there's little you can do, and I'm laughing at you.

No one's going to bully ME.

Yet you stayed to the end and longer!

Bye then!:xyxwave:

I'm not going to even try to explain to you why your self-righteous little rant is a joke in itself because you won't get it and to be perfectly honest i can't be bothered! :laugh:

Interesting thread.This CBB has shown the best and worst human behaviours from some HMs.So its not surprising that some members of this forum could be deemed to have been OTT with things they have posted.

I don't know about you guys but when I start a thread its because I am genuinely interested in getting a response and reading other members reasoned thoughts on the subject and I feel there is a better chance of this happening if we remember that its not what we say but how we present it which counts,not only about the HMs but in our interactions with each other.

I have enjoyed sharing with the vast majority on here and on the very few occasions when this has not been so I ignore.