Densie was allowed to stay and went on to win?
 

Yet a guy does something similar and is chucked out? :shrug:

Exactly!!! I thought Jeremy had done something far worse than what he did! It was wrong what he did but not ejection material.

There is more to this, Jeremy will spill all, he was a loose cannon

Denise <33333 :flutter:

:umm2:so you have no problem with her assaulting another woman?

Not surprised to see you are the one leading these double standards, have a word with yourself son

I don't think this is comparable, Denise didn't pull the twin's underwear down. It was silly and I'd be annoyed if it was me (though I'd have accepted her apology and moved on instead of causing a massive fuss like the twins did), but it was very different.

If anything, it should be compared with Hazel pulling down Daley's boxers (for which she received a warning but wasn't removed). I assume the individual situations / contexts dictate the different punishments.

Denise should have been kicked out too ew

She didn't assault another women at all lmao, she pulled a tiny bit of her pants down which she had underwear on under it

Yes I will forever be baffled how Denise came out of pantsgate a hero and that it won the show for her. Despicable, repulsive woman

How do you expect to be taken seriously?

So,it was uncalled for physical contact much the same as Jeremy makes no difference if she had underwear on or not, would that have made a difference with Chloe?

I haven't even said anything about the Jeremy thing and how I feel about it in the first place lmao because I don't even know how I feel about it so stop jumping on me

Because she made a silly mistake and apologised (more than once) as soon as she realized she'd caused offense, yet the twins caused a huge drama anyway.

Also, again, very different situations. The twin (I forget which one it was) wasn't naked underneath her trousers. It's entirely reasonable to be annoyed, even angered, by what Denise did, but the massive fuss (threatening to call lawyers / sue BB if they show it) was ridiculous. When she apologised, that should have been the end of it.

I think so too, he's clearly pretty unstable - more so than the producer's maybe realised - and so it was probably best for all concerned to have him out

:joker:

Can you all step back and find all the differences in the contexts because there are ****ing several.

Denise's behaviour was intended as a joke
Jeremy's behaviour was intended as a sexual advance. He got off lightly

I'm no fan of Denise really but you all need some perspective if you think these two scenes are similar.

So when you go to a club and you make a small advance on someone you like but misread the situation do you deserve prison?

Did you just assume that I've removed somebody else's clothing without their permission some time in the past?

Except this wasn't a club. There was no dancing. there wasn't even any advancing. There was a drunk guy with his head down the loo who thought he'd try his luck.

He misread signals your over reacting

I'm overreacting? :joker:

Read back over your posts over the past 10 hours, I beg.

Na You're under reacting.