To everyone saying Chloe should've had more clothes on underneath
 

why? I'm genuinely curious, why?

She is on TV?

Because they're probably sad about Jeremy leaving so they make up random ****

Don't know

I dont understand why she should have had more clothes on at all. Its up to her if shes naked under a robe...she might have just had a shower, she may just be more comfortable like that, whatever the reason its not like she was strutting about butt naked :shrug:

its a disgrace people are trying to blame Chloe, poor girl she seemed genuinely distressed and shocked by the whole thing and rightly so imo

I agree with the OP its nonsense. She's gonna be living there for potentially three weeks what is she supposed to wear? Is she supposed to go into the shower fully clothed?

Are people saying she deserved it? Please no.

Because maybe you're in a house full of strangers half of them men and there is always room for that wardrobe malfunction,just a thought.

wow some of this is reeking of "she deserved to be raped because her skirt was too short" kind of crap :bored:

So you'd rather that before she went to help her housemate being sick in the next room, she stopped and put more layers on? I'm sure the thought of Jeremy misinterpreting the situation was the first thing on her mind, not her helping him, sure.

People are saying "Jeremy was drunk" and "she should've worn more clothing"
Neither of those excuse what happened and I don't understand why anyone should have to wear 'more clothes' so that someone doesn't look at them naked

Yeah I doubt she was flirting with him while he's puking his guts up fgs

I thought she was appropriately covered. :shrug:

I think alcohol was the reason for a lot of the drama and behaviour in the show, and BB can be held responsible for that.

because no one who is wearing jeans and a t-shirt is ever assaulted, duh

yes fedora brigade obviously she wasn't assaulted blah blah blah

If there was any situation for her to take advantage of, surely it would have been when they were together at the jacuzzi. I can't imagine she's that desperate that she'd try to seduce a drunken, vomiting mess with his head half in the toilet.

Well I'm not saying she deserved it,just that I'de be a bit more cautious around strangers.

I know right? Jeremy was way out of line but the only thing I could say in his defense is that he seems to have serious mental issues, he doesn't seem to be seeing things in a real way and atleast he accepted that he was out of order as well. Not excusing what he did though and the only correct action was to remove him

because she's a woman and apparently we're back in 1964

Anyone that says Chloe was to blame to the situation is disgusting and deserves no respect whatsoever imo.

Jeremy obviously didn't mean to offend or upset Chloe, but he did, an inappropriate drunken mistake, which the only potential outcome was for him to be rightly removed.

But for anyone to lay any sort of blame at Chloe's feet is utterly repulsive.

Poor Chloe

Yup I agree I wasn't going to say it but that's what im getting from the forum to.

plus people saying she shouldn't have put herself in that situation....what situation? since when is comforting someone who's sick ever considered a dangerous situation? :shrug:

Honestly half of TiBB tonight is like reading Ken's mind

What the **** is going on?

Did he rape her? All I heard was he tried to open her gown.. Not agreeing with what he did.. But I see this word "rape" being used here.. Same context or?

I totally agree Liam