If it had been Ken who exposed Chloe would it change your view?
 

I know some people think Chloe overacted and defended Jeremy's actions as being inappropriate but should not of been kicked out just warned.

Now if it had been Ken who did the exposing would you still feel the same way with an old fat man getting her breasts out?

Not a judgment just wonder if it would change your view of the situation.

ken would have slipped in a finger

he is not a breast man

Well given Ken's general ****ty attitude towards women, yeah, it would have been viewed differently. But why bother speculating? Where is it getting anyone?

:laugh2:

exactly nowhere.:laugh:

I don't think it should matter. Any human adult doing that to any other human adult is equally bad regardless of the age, gender, physical appearance of either the perpetrator or the victim. That's how it should be.
However in the real world people are superficial and for some reason an older man doing it would be worse than an adult male who is around 30.

Is that not because an older man should know better.

If he had been drunk and she had been in the toilet with him, it would make no difference at all who it was. I don't think he should touch. I don't think she should have allowed herself to be in the toilet with a vomming drunk.

Its like all those horror films when the heroine goes upstairs and you sit on the sofa and think why are you going up there idiot, run away!