Antidode To The BBBOTS Katie Hopkin's Is A Nice Person PROPAGANDA
 

Yet again BBBOTS turned into a Propaganda show for the fave of many viewers,BBBOTS often does that,it doesn't work as they say it does,that they examine all Contestants equally.

They have avoided examining and discussing Katie's worst moments,whereas they only talk about her good points, which they always do with the nastiest ones who many support.

They have avoided criticism of her "Cami's got good stuff" when she was rejoicing at Cami's "Her family don't love her" and "No one would want to know you be friends unless they were using you" abuse toward Alicia.

Much as Perez is nasty person cos of his treatment of various celebs and his constant attention seeking in house they should have criticised Katie not allowing him to escape to a place of sanctuary and for her standing over him while he tried to escape

and for threatening to crash frying pans around his head all night and for threatening to spit or pis* in his water.

All these things were avoided and not examined as they would be with any other HM.

BBBOTS is forever doing that.Avoiding discussing nasty faves worst points and instead only speak about them when they say something nice.

So they've avoided all Katie's worst points,not given them much if any attention,and instead came out with that she was a nice person.

Everyone has nice moments, the difference with Katie is,she is twisted and doesn't like showing nice moments,she naturally prefers to be nasty.

It's not manufactured for her career.You can see that she bounces around,is quicker,and shows real anger on her face when she's having a real go at someone,

so it is genuine,she really is nasty,and does have a cold ,or she prefers to be cold, and attack people,the nice moments are rare.

One thing the Lying Propaganda BBBOTS didn't tell people is, All people have nice moments.The difference between them and Katie is that they don't abuse victims of Ebola,victims of Cancer or call for Palestinian children to be murdered.

They'd also allow people to escape when they are trying to hide & get peace away from the arguing and they wouldn't threaten to crash frying pans around anyone's head all night or threaten to urinate or spit in their water.

Yet that point for some reason was missed.A pretty obvious point,that even if Katie has nice moments,it's clear so everyone else has nice ones too,they don't abuse people in all the ways I said ,so why didn't BBBOTS make that point.

I know cos they just wanted to say Katie is nice cos it was propaganda BS yet again just talking about nice points of nasty fave,which they always do in their avoid of speaking about bad points

So it seems that the actions of the troll known as Perez is ok, but when someone, who is trying very hard to be nice, brings him to task, that they are wrong and BOTS is unfair. I am having a hard time reconciling your opinions how ever strange they seem to me.

All commercial Television is propaganda, what sells, sells. Certain laws are in place with regards to factual news gathering I would imagine taste and decency as well but apart from that the companies only have a responsibility to their shareholders. As long as the actual phone lines aren't rigged then they can edit or set the agenda for a program as they see fit.

The viewer has the ultimate sanction, they can simply choose not to watch a programme. The programme would simply be cancelled if enough people stopped watching.

You could always raise the issue with OFCOM and see if they uphold your complaint, I would be very interested in the response.

Showning bias in a light entertainment gameshow as far as I know is not against the law and very hard to prove, the BBC is often accused of both left and right wing bias but I cannot recall anything ever sticking.

Katie Hopkins is the chosen one, it's been very obvious since Launch Night.

I think you are probably right. Well done to C5 for making such an excellent choice.

:clap1: