Double standards of housemates
 

Lastnights BB saw Cammi parading in nothing but thong and very small bra...it also showed her stating "hurting for a squirting"...and then cavorting all over Callum Best...she appeared to be desperate for Cxxx....now then putting things into prespective..Chloe got a guy thrown out..receiving a warning from police...branded a rapist..having to sign a sex offenders register and tarninshing his career...because he touched Chloes dressing gown...if Callum was to of reacted in the same way as Chloe did...would they have charged Cammi with sexual assault and evicted her!

Well they didn't charge Jeremy with sexual assault and there's a clear difference. Firstly Cami and callum have been flirting with eachother since the show started, there's clearly a mutual thing going on between them and yet still neither of them have opened the others clothing revealing a breast etc The Jeremy/Chloe thing happened while Chloe was trying to help a sick Jeremy, there was no encouragement or "green light" given from Chloe to allow him to open her clothing

its being going on for years. denise welch hit Michael madsen in the face and stalked and abused him for weeks she also pulled down a womans trousers....that girla Bianca last year ran around naked umpteen times and demanded Winston fck her on the garden floor and suck his ckc within minutes of metting him....Katie Hopkins has stalked abused threatened perez umpteen times smashed up property and threatened to poison his drinks etc and not even a warning? its a biased man hating sexist show

Sorry he was thrown out and received a police caution cos Chloe didnt want to press charges..but for god sake...what virginal innocent perfect world are you in...Theres noway if you were dying that Chloe would go near you...in other words shed never make a doctor/lawyer/nurse..you have to be in rooms with men on your own in these proffessions!She cried Wolfe and the punishment was very unproportionate

I honestly didn't see anything to outrageous that jeremy should of been kicked out, end of the day, he was very very drunk, he had a some what attractive lady hanging over him, he pulled her dressing gown, and it was done with, there in the big brother has, loads of people about camera's on 24/7, i just saw that to be honest as a very drunken mistake, not sexual harassment, yes he should of never done it, but i mean come on how many of us in our younger days didn't do something a little wrong when we was drunk, not denying it wasn't wrong but still i think it was blown out of proportion

Is that for me? lol hhmm

I'll just ignore that bit and move on to her "crying wolf" She told Big Brother what had happened and Jeremy told the exact same story, how was she "crying wolf"?

she invaded his private space she had no right to be there he was steaming drunk and sick she also had no clothes on under her robe, if a man had done what she did gone into the bathroom when a drunk women is being sick naked under his robe and his robe fell open, hed be arrested not her. the law and culture is biased its a sick joke

Riiiiggghhhhtttttt

Ok you...the term crying wolfe...yes Jeremy touched her gown like everybodyelse has said ..ok shouldnt of done it but she cried got the guy sacked, involved the police..hang on he didnt rape her he touched her gown ..where she was alone..tits in his face..makes a living by gettin her tits out..he was pissed...so she went to town...omg youd **** urself if Chloe offered you to go to stay at her house.

Well crying wolf implies that she was making up a story which didn't happen, also she wasn't the one who got the Police involved, that was BB covering themselves no doubt. It's pretty unfair to blame her the way you're doing. Yes jeremy was drunk and he probably didn't know she wasn't wearing anything under the gown but she wasn't, Chloe got a fright, it seemed like a genuine reaction to me. The next day she said that she didn't think it was done maliciously, what more do you want from the girl? tbf if you want to blame a HMs reaction for Jeremy being kicked out, it'd be fairer to say Perez reacted "worse" than Chloe did

s did cry wolf she made out as if hed attacked her which he hadn't, she deliberately milked the situation in a thoroughly disingenuous and ruthless way to get some cheap camera attention. he didn't lay a hand on her, she invaded his space. she went in there naked too

Her account of events was the exact same as Jeremys though so no she didn't "cry wolf" Also, she didn't go in there naked, she was wearing a full length bathrobe which is more coverage than the little bikinis they've been wearing in the hot tub :laugh:

..we know what the law is I studied it for 7 yrs...but your really not listening..I think this case would be thrown out because of her involvement..BB were judge and jury..she did involve police by overeacting...youd have to admit when crossexamined the case would be thrown out due to
mitigating circumstances...Jeremy should take her to court for the allegation and get his name cleared.

she had no legal right to enter the bathroom when he was in there, she was naked under her robe. for all we know she deliberately left the robe loose so as to trap a famous man to milk some publicity and air time....stranger things have happened.....if the roles were reversed the man would still be getting all the time. her actions are a disgrace her milking of a harmless accident was a disgrace. I hope he goes to court to clear his name, maybe he can get her name on the sex pest register instead.

jeremy should take her to court for what allegation? She "alleged" that he'd pulled her robe open and revealed her breast........Jeremy confirmed that this is what happened, how is he going to sue her for telling the exact same version of events that she did? You can't take a person to court for crying too much last time I checked.......

wrong. he ddindt pull anything open. he touched a string which fell loose. the fact she was naked underneath was her choice. try going into a womans bathroom when shes drunk wearing nothing under your bathrobe and see what reaction you get? what reaction do u think youd get? eh?

Quite easy You go to police station and say I want to press charges for false allegations...Then he gets a lawyer and prosecution have to prove beyond all reasonable doubt that he did it....the fact he said he touched her gown doesnt constitute an assault...

true

wheres the double standard?

You are completely ignoring the fact that his account of what happened in the bathroom was the same as Chloes though, nobody has to prove anything beyond reasonable doubt because Jeremy is recorded on TV saying that he did exactly what Chloe said he did :laugh:

Ugh right that's my last post on this with you because we seem to be going round in circles now

What you onabout now...do I have to explain again...

No feeding from me :laugh:
https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/i...tabzDehUlxmXrQ

youre going round in circles im going straight, youre ducking the questions as usual

Im glad your goin cos ur clearly not listening..people change statements hourly..we didnt see anything it wasnt recorded so how would she prove he assaulted her...

It seems to be being implied by some that if someone works in the glamour/sex industry, then they automatically become fair game to being touched/abused/groped - no they don't

I believe that the incident happened because all the housemates are concerned about is air time. The girls, including Chloe knew that by "helping" Jeremy they would be seen on the show. In doing this, they didn't care what position they put themselves in. In normal circumstances, I'm certain none of those self obsessed so and so's would have gone anywhere near him. Anyway, Jeremy did something that wasn't quite predictable, and the rest is history.