Damned if they do and Damned if they don't.
 

Parez sometimes behaves like a prick. His OTT behaviour can be exhausting, embarrassing and sometimes funny.

Katie Hopkins can behave like a child. Sometimes she's aggressive, condescending and stirring and sometimes she's funny.

Many of the Parez fans can see no wrong in his behaviour and absolutely refuse to see a nicer side to KH and many of Katie Hopkins fans can see no wrong in her behaviour and refuse to see the nicer side of Parez. I'm inclined to believe that if Parez fans saw this man torturing kittens they would still defend his actions and if the Katie fans viewed her mincing babies they would continue to sing her praises.

Reading some of the posts on here is like viewing blind adoration. I have to ask, do these individuals really mean so much to you?

No,couldn't care less about them tbh, but it's fun debating most of the time.

They're both idiots. Let's just all agree on that.

I think the panto drama of taking sides probably stops the program getting as boring as it probably actually is.

I see it as 2 people forcing unnatural drama on the house in the same way that BB does by poking its nose in sometimes.

Thing is, natural life is about ebb and flow - interest, excitement, fun, arguments and boredom. Its not about watching some circus freak show.

I'm close to switching this series off, totally bored with it now.

:clap2:

I don't think I have blindly defended a favourite I have chosen, that to me would be ridiculous, only doing so when I feel they did little or nothing wrong during certain times in there, as no matter who we choose I am sure many of us do and would acknowledge their faults and know it is a game in there and the housemates play it to the best of their ability, and it is how they play that game in there making the most entertainment without having to verge on too much nastiness towards the other housemates that enjoy watching, and to a degree I even enjoy some wind up merchants in there if they pretty much know where to draw the line. What I don't like in some housemates, such as Cami as an example, is downright nastiness and a vicious tongue because they happen to delight in it.

It is just a game and they get paid good money to be in there to entertain us, so we can choose who to support. That remembered, it is good to get involved in debates on housemates, but try to not get personal with those who have differing views, we can respect others views whilst making points about housemates imo.

I of course would always like my favourite or one of my favourites to make the final and even better to go on to win, however, if they don't, it won't worry me at all, they do their best for their fans as do their fans to keep them in there.

That said, we all see housemates behaviours differently, and it would be boring to debate if we didn't.

They both need custom made straight jackets tbh :D

Mine would be black with light sabre buckles and top gun style patches :joker:

Yep and a big thumbs up for the bold bit.

I don't get idolatry and that's probably why I'm an atheist!

Nothing wrong with having favourites, just as there's nothing wrong with adoration. The trouble with blind adoration is, it makes for such a one sided argument that goes nowhere and ends up with loads of tit for tat hate campaigns on the boards. We'd have to be a bit daft to honestly believe either of these contestants can do no wrong or that the other contestants within the divide are all horrible or all nice. Maybe its fun for a while but it gets old real quick.

ED because I'm a didn't proof read!

Parez would definitely need a custom made one. That guy can wriggle out of anything!. As for Katie, i'd just make her sit on the naughty step.

welcome to the internet :wavey: