ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   CBB15 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=660)
-   -   Bring back voting who you want out, not to save (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=271827)

Jenn B 26-01-2015 04:18 PM

Bring back voting who you want out, not to save
 
Im so sorry if been covered, but I'm new to the forum and did try to search but to no avail. PLEASE PLEASE bring back vote who you want out, not vote who you want to save. Yes I know why they've changed it, coz the annoying yet HM that keep us talking/moaning will then get kicked out to early, then we moan it's boring, but I for one would not find CBB boring if that vile human being PEREZ was out. I would really enjoy it as I'm getting to the point of never watching it again

GET PEREZ OUT they chanted, so door ittttt

Ninastar 26-01-2015 04:19 PM

Totally agree

I hate the 'vote to save' bullcrap

Niamh. 26-01-2015 04:22 PM

No!! VTS with 3 or more up eachtime, is perfect, clears out the bores first

Maxxie. 26-01-2015 04:23 PM

Prefer vts these days tbh

Daniel-X 26-01-2015 04:28 PM

Vote to save is much more better it means the bigger personalities usually tend to stay and the bores leave earlier on

Jenn B 26-01-2015 04:29 PM

But like so many have said here, cami is out this eviction and I do not find her boring at all. I find her amusing in a strange way, also Alicia she wasn't boring, she was starting to come into her own, with the banter with Katie H.

Also Chloe, another amusing in a strange way out. It doesn't always work getting the bores out first. Look at Callum, yes easy on the eye, but he doesn't do much besides lay on his bed or have a cig by the jacuzzi

Macie Lightfoot 26-01-2015 04:31 PM

Vote to Save is garbage. Not only has it not produced the promised results about ~getting all the bores out~ (the woman pictured in LuciaX's signature was evicted in a VTS with practically the whole house up), but all it actually accomplishes is keeping festering ****s in each week like Conor and Jim Davidson. VTS is a flop.

Daniel-X 26-01-2015 04:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Macie Lightfoot (Post 7532212)
Vote to Save is garbage. Not only has it not produced the promised results about ~getting all the bores out~ (the woman pictured in LuciaX's signature was evicted in a VTS with practically the whole house up), but all it actually accomplishes is keeping festering ****s in each week like Conor and Jim Davidson. VTS is a flop.

Fair enough I take your point with Frenchy but I did say most...

Lostie! 26-01-2015 04:37 PM

VTS has rewarded nastiness too many times for me to support that system. Also, it doesn't get out "bores" as much as people like to suggest.

Macie Lightfoot 26-01-2015 04:37 PM

Vote to Save also evicted Heaven over Aden lmfao what a victory

Shaun 26-01-2015 04:44 PM

Vote to Save has resulted in:
- Leslie going over Stephanie/George/Kellie
- Frenchy going over Stephanie/Ricci/Kellie
- Liz Jones going over Sam Faiers
- Courtney Stodden & Louie Spence going over Mario Falcone/Carol McGiffin/Vicky Entwhistle :unsure: lmfao what even
- Jasmine Lennard going over Rhian Sugden
- Chris going over Arron (BB13)
- Shievonne going over Conor by a margin of about 80% (I mean they both sucked but come on)
- Caroline going out of eight housemates up including Luke S and Sara (that's pretty much the definitive antidote to the "VTS SAVES BIG CHARACTERS" argument right there)

I mean... there are 'some examples' and then there are 'some examples'.

Loukas 26-01-2015 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shaun (Post 7532266)
Vote to Save has resulted in:
- Leslie going over Stephanie/George/Kellie
- Frenchy going over Stephanie/Ricci/Kellie
- Liz Jones going over Sam Faiers
- Courtney Stodden & Louie Spence going over Mario Falcone/Carol McGiffin/Vicky Entwhistle :unsure: lmfao what even
- Jasmine Lennard going over Rhian Sugden
- Chris going over Arron (BB13)
- Shievonne going over Conor by a margin of about 80% (I mean they both sucked but come on)
- Caroline going out of eight housemates up including Luke S and Sara (that's pretty much the definitive antidote to the "VTS SAVES BIG CHARACTERS" argument right there)

I mean... there are 'some examples' and then there are 'some examples'.

i was gonna say i kinda liked vote to save but i forgot about all of this, you've convinced me otherwise :clap2: :laugh:

Dollface 26-01-2015 04:49 PM

Agreed

ebandit 26-01-2015 04:51 PM

merit
 
there is merit in both................but where 'you decide' i prefer VTE

as we are voting for an eviction

keep VTS for after the final eviction

Mark L

Ramsay 26-01-2015 05:00 PM

The only reason they have VTS in CBB is so they can keep the ones they spent a **** load of money on for longer. with the civilian BB they don't give a **** which is a shame as 3 or more HMs up every week with VTS is the best option

poppsywoppsy 26-01-2015 05:03 PM

I am totally for a vote to evict. When it is a Vts or free pass, it takes weeks to get the antagonists out.

RichardG 26-01-2015 05:03 PM

VTS isn't perfect but I still much prefer it to VTE, especially with 3+ people up. It has more chance of keeping the entertainment in for longer than a straight VTE does.

JoshBB 26-01-2015 05:05 PM

I see the benefits for both and the current system of VTS for celebrity and VTE for civilian is fine right now.

smudgie 26-01-2015 05:06 PM

I am more likely to vote in the VTE scenario.

JoshBB 26-01-2015 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smudgie (Post 7532315)
I am more likely to vote in the VTE scenario.

[2].

chuff me dizzy 26-01-2015 05:11 PM

Agree, vote to save makes more money and is easier to fiddle by the producers

Jack_ 26-01-2015 05:11 PM

Vote to save only works when there's multiple housemates up, ideally four or five. Since they're always messing with nomination rules they should just make it so that anyone who receives a nom goes up, that'd do the trick.

And an important point that the detractors of VTS always miss when criticising it is the completely unnecessary vote freezes they insist on doing, because that often turns the vote into a head to head which under vote to save is just a reverse vote to evict. Caroline was evicted after they constantly kept saving housemates until she was guaranteed to lose to anti-votes. I wouldn't say I was a fan for the record but there were worse housemates up that week.

Two all up vote to saves a series (excluding the vote to win week) would suffice in culling the dullards tbh, and if you made them doubles that'd be four non-entities rid of. Perfect.

Ramsay 26-01-2015 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 7532332)
Agree, vote to save makes more money and is easier to fiddle by the producers

If anything i'd assume Evict would make more money

bots 26-01-2015 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chuff me dizzy (Post 7532332)
Agree, vote to save makes more money and is easier to fiddle by the producers

Its also driven by voters positive feelings to a candidate rather than negative, so in the end, its should bring the person with the best qualities. That's the theory anyway.

jackc1806 26-01-2015 05:16 PM

VTS is better, kept Aaron in BB12 to the end.


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.