ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   CBB15 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=660)
-   -   Perez Hilton So unfair (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=271835)

VanessaFeltz. 26-01-2015 06:17 PM

So unfair
 
What did he do deserve that free pass from next eviction? They just put him in the secret room with that app voting so unfairly. This was one of the best series and they started to rig it AGAIN. As much as i think Perez needs to be in the final nobody should win/be in final with rigging. I would rather Kavana to win fairly rather than my favourite to win with rigging.

Kazanne 26-01-2015 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MelihV (Post 7532571)
What did he do deserve that free pass from next eviction? They just put him in the secret room with that app voting so unfairly. This was one of the best series and they started to rig it AGAIN. As much as i think Perez needs to be in the final nobody should win/be in final with rigging. I would rather Kavana to win fairly rather than my favourite to win with rigging.

Nice that someone has a sense of fair play,it's never a win if you are pushed there,good post MelihV

abhorson 26-01-2015 06:21 PM

Sadly, all about the ratings. They could not give a toss.

Should add though, without the ratings, the show dies. So it is money for them or no show for us.

We should decide.

VanessaFeltz. 26-01-2015 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by abhorson (Post 7532586)
Sadly, all about the ratings. They could not give a toss.

Should add though, without the ratings, the show dies. So it is money for them or no show for us.

We should decide.

Yeah they rig it all the time but this is a BIG rig and last year they didnt put housemates who entered on day two for public vote to get power housemate status but Pauline could give them the killer nomination, how fair is that? If Jale didnt have the killer nomination im sure she could made it into final week.

Samm 26-01-2015 06:33 PM

Yes

Stormy 26-01-2015 06:36 PM

I always thought that was the whole purpose of CBB. Get a group of celebrities, isolate them from the public and "play" with their minds/emotions and watch them react. The more diverse the personalities in the house, the more entertaining it is to watch them react to the mind games. I see the "riggin" as the mind games. I love the ones that work in favour of the housemates I like and hate the ones that work in the favour of the housemates I don't like. It's all part of the experience of watching CBB.

I was never looking at CBB as a show to represent the most moral, honest, intelligent and likeable celebrities who are put in a house to play a politically correct, totally fair and honest game. Not my thing...it would be too boring.

JoshBB 26-01-2015 06:38 PM

CBB is always like this tbh

Jack The Cat 26-01-2015 07:53 PM

Yes but they won't.

Benjamin 26-01-2015 07:54 PM

He won;t get the free pass so I don;t know why you are all freaking out. :laugh:

Amy Jade 26-01-2015 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Benjamin (Post 7532899)
He won;t get the free pass so I don;t know why you are all freaking out. :laugh:

Personally I dislike the manipulation in general. Had Michelle been in Perez's situation I would still be against her getting a free pass.

Mokka 26-01-2015 08:02 PM

I don't mind them playing mind games, pulling the housemates strings, directing their show in the way they think will get them the most ratings, etc... but when they charge the public to vote and tell everyone that the great British Public decides... then its taking the piss.

They want to have their cake and eat it two, and that is where the problem lies. They need to decide if they want to run it with BB being in control or the public, and they need to stop charging for votes if they are going to pull the strings in their own favour anyways.

Withano 26-01-2015 08:17 PM

Almost makes me regret watching the show to start with, who thought this was a good idea? Even if they found a way to choose a housemate fairly it would be stupid but to just choose Perez for no reason is infuriating

thinkingoutloud 26-01-2015 09:00 PM

They were scared another housemate was going to walk so they had to find a way to convince him to stay. Another manipulative move from him.

Ninastar 26-01-2015 09:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amy Jade (Post 7532948)
Personally I dislike the manipulation in general. Had Michelle been in Perez's situation I would still be against her getting a free pass.

Totally agree. Girl, what is happening to me?

Withano 26-01-2015 09:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Benjamin (Post 7532899)
He won;t get the free pass so I don;t know why you are all freaking out. :laugh:

a person being up for nomination is nearly as unjust. the whole minipulation does my nut in

joeysteele 26-01-2015 09:06 PM

Well the first night of the series they made it that katie Hopkins couldn't be nominated but could choose 2 housemates to be up, then Katie price couldn't be when she went in.

I don't agree with it but BB have been doing it for ages now, not just with Perez

Also had Perez been nominating with them then he likely would have been nominated for eviction, with I guess Patsy avoiding being up for eviction.
However perez would have nominated Cami and Katie Hopkins so theylikely would still have been up anyway.

erinp5 26-01-2015 09:20 PM

It's nothing they haven't done before
On Day 68, the housemates were told that Helen had been evicted, then she left the house. However unbeknownst to the other housemates, she was actually living next door watching their every moves


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.