Patsy and Nadia nominating each other
 

They're supposed to be friends. This is some of the poorest game play I've ever seen in CBB.

Get both of them out.

Trust you will be throwing Cami a few votes tonight then Girth to ensure this happens

Of course.

They obviously both want to get the hell out of there, I'd imagine they asked eachother in a round about way :laugh:

Nadia applied some logic to hers as We've seen Patsy up early in a morning moaning that nobody is up and awake. Even though I do agree it is slightly shocking I didn't expect it

Patsy did it last week and this week

But that's exactly it, it's not gameplay. Neither cares about winning or staying, so they're not nominating based on strategy / alliances, etc.

The nominated duo share their thoughts on Perez, Katie H, eviction night and why Patsy's morning habits are getting on everyone's nerves....
http://bigbrother.channel5.com/day-2...ys-heart-heart

That may be the case but its a cop out IMI. Stay till the bitter end or walk. I dont agree with HM's helping each other to leave.

They have absolutely no reasons whatsoever to vote for each other.. both are friends & have each others backs in there. It's obvious both are fed up now and neither have any intentions of winning and have secretly had a word with each other which Big Brother have missed out to put one another up so they can get the hell out of there. The reactions towards each other when hearing they were both up pretty much proves it.

Maybe they're just not gameplayers...

People apply this kind of "what kind of game are they playing ffs!!!!!" complaint against housemates like Nadia and Keith when really they couldn't give a rat's arse and they've both expressed exasperation and a desire to leave (without sacrificing their paycheck, as they have said Perez was doing by 'walking'). Idk what's so hard to explain about that.

Plus, even if they were gameplayers, then surely nominating your friend out of "compassion" - in the very strong possibility that these nominations are later shown to the house - is going to make you seem nicer/less of a target than if you'd gone in there saying "I WANT TO NOMINATE CAMI BECAUSE SHE IS A TOTAL ARSE"

BB should have rejected their nominations

thats the kind of loyalty you get with lefties and peaceniks!

The thing is if they walk they don't get paid, so they are trying to get themselves out by being evicted.

so they've had a secret word with each other to help each other get out of the house??

Perez fans crack me up lol

I agree its what they're trying to do but I dont agree with them doing it. BB should have rejected their nomination IMO.

Why? I don't feel that their reasons were any less valid than the others.

And there's no proof that they had some sort of arrangement.

It could also very easily back fire. It looks like Cami Li is gonna go so they're gonna have to go thru the process again and if they nominate each other again then I definitely think the nominations should be rejected.

Loling at the excuses for them now,lol like they want to go home and are doing each other a favour,yes of course they are:joker::joker: and the earth is flat. Any other housemates would have been panned.

Exactly, Calum's reason for nominating Patsy should have been rejected in my opinion

How the **** did you just equate two nominations to left-wing agenda :conf:

Well they could tell Katie Hopkins just what they think of her to her face and get ejected.:smug: