First bought win in BB history
 

Up till the light of the eviction, Pricey was nowhere. Hours before she rocketed to the top courtesy of her agent and friends with deep pockets on speed dial. She needed the win to promote her next venture so she bought it, well done Chav, you got your way, Now bugger off and get your tits fixed so they will be pert for your next husband. Slag.

:umm2:

Sam? I take it you weren't keen :joker::joker::joker:

:clap1:

I think she won fair and square tbh, I would have liked Michelle or Hopkins to win but it is what it is.

Only part of the campaign I found to be in bad taste was her brother writing messages from 'Harvey' and using it to try and get sympathy votes.

I watched it on my laptop and I was pretty pissed off tbh. The slag bought the victory, well her friends and agent played that role.

She had her hairdresser feeding her info every day, so how is that fair.

I don't care how she won, I'm just happy that she did and Hopkins (and none of her friends) didn't. :laugh:

I have to agree...she was never mentioned in BOTS as a possible winner. Although she was 'liked' she was never mentioned as a winner...it was all Keith/Calum and Katie Hopkins....:shrug:

She will hopefully disappear back into Chav land until her next predictable book appears :sleep::sleep::sleep:

Exactly...

Since the beginning of BB/CBB itself all BB/CBB evictions/wins have been 'bought' as a vote will cost you dosh :D

..lots of 'grapes' on the forum today and not all of them 'ripe':hehe:

:clap2:

Because you wouldn't be the the same if Hopkins had won. :hehe:

a) I hope that people who didn't like Hopkins would have still have had the decency to congratulate her/accept her win as fair if she'd won, rather than having sour grapes and thinking that calling her whatever the equivalent to a 'chav' or a 'slag' would be makes the result 'right'.

b) Except she didn't win.

I mean really she did nothing, and i mean nothing

she just sat there and did zero

how she won is a mystery

There used to be a British tradition of at least trying to be gracious in defeat - to make the losers seem dignified and decent and possibly worthy of some respect.

Now that people need to make a living by being undignified and ill-mannered it all goes out the window. "Needs must" I guess.

Quite an assumption there. Not sure what it's based on, exactly. Not everybody tries to invalidate the win when they don't like the winner.

1) She won because of her "fame" outside not because of what she did inside thats why it is unfair

2) Her family voted for her like probably 50k times

:joker:

It's like you read my mind :hehe:

Would they have hell haha keep telling yourself that hun and go find posts from Helen's win over Ashleigh and see REAL sour grapes

http://www.unrealitytv.co.uk/wp-cont...t-14.20.38.png

Helen winning and the reaction on here

No sour grapes here Annie I just wish anyone would have won over KP really,even Perez,at least he did SOMETHING. it's just s bit of an anti climax to a good show,good luck to her though:wavey:

:joker::joker::joker: it was mint:hehe: great year,great winner

Good won over evil :D :hehe:

Brilliant night :D england win and a a Non-hopkins win :D:cheer2::cheer2:

Been a great series mind you :D great fun on the forum too :D (give or take the odd tense moment) :laugh: