London: Soho : Evil Mugger knocks a 93 year old man down for just £10
 

This was reported on ITV1London News

If I meet this mugger
he will get a head butt
then he will be on the deck.


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/...4093604014.jpg
Fast knock like that could have killed that 93 year old man

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/...4076555129.jpg
Yes Punk
The Police are going to arrest you soon.


[Victim Stanley Evans says he was left 'flailing like a seal' on the ground for 10 minutes after the attack]

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3RvvTWNA9
Video on that link
and the Update is he stole £10 ( Ref :ITV1 London)

Its Evil because
at 93 years old
a fast knock like that could kill you



The topic is Catch this Evil Mugger

Bitch.

what an evil man

Yes Very Evil
he could have Died.

hope he feel real proud of himself - would do him a poem on how strong he is but then again - i think i will miss.

Just sick and so sad.

There was a 90 yr old woman run over and killed near me recently and some scumbag stole her purse after it happened before even an ambulance was called. Hope he's found too.

This shit cunt cowardly bastard must live in the area, which narrows down the 'search area', he's hardly likely to commute everyday to carry out his 'daring heists', and it smacks of an 'opportunist' act.

Also, the cctv pictures are so clear of him that relatives, friends or neighbours must recognise him or at least have their suspicions.

So, I hope it's not too long before this spineless bastard is caught. Don't hold your breath that he will be suitably punished if he is though, because it totally depends upon which judge he appears before.

Forget 'mitigation' or 'rehabilitation', all crimes against children, the infirm and elderly, should carry mandatory minimum 10 year sentences as punishment pure and simple, and as a very loud and clear message of deterrent, that the weakest members of society will be protected against despicable, spineless, predatory cowards.

I read about that. Disgusting.

Wow, hard to know what to say about this really, that a young man should think it OK to mug a man of this age is shocking. He probably needed the money for a drug fix to feed his addiction and was desperate . As he was sexually abused as a child and beaten also by his stepfather he dropped out of school but had no qualifications so couldn't get a job.

So homeless and hungry he was caught shoplifting and now has a criminal record. Let down by the system time after time he unfortunately found solace in drugs and now has to turn to crime to feed his habit.

A sad tale really, this man needs help and perhaps he will receive a minimal sentence, drug counselling , rehabilitation and help finding paid employment and a place in a hostel before more permanent accommodation can be found.

Thus speaks the case for the defence......

Alternatively.... We could just string the Bastard up !!





.

:joker::joker::joker: My love for you deepens.

i read this and a hate poem was brewing for you nedusa - and at the end - a marriage proposal - it had me going.:dance:

ps want some got news - they got him. so lets hope he gets the correct sentence now.

I like a vast number of people are sick and tired of hearing about crimes of violence like this on elderly and infirm people, particularly muggings and burglaries, where an elderly person is burgled and terrorised in their own home.

These crimes have a devastating impact on old people who mostly never recover from such a traumatic event. The same is true of a mugging regardless of the extent of violence used, the sheer act of violation especially of an older more vulnerable person can leave the victim with extreme psychological scars that many never recover from.

To attack and rob an elderly person who by all accounts lived in the same area and displayed no obvious signs of wealth is one of the most sickeningly cowardly acts imaginable.

I also question whether trying to defend the crime by rolling out a long list of sad hard luck factors like troubled childhood or drug problem etc should be allowed to alter the fact that this person has committed this crime.

I would even go as far as arguing that these so called mitigating factors used by defence teams to elicit lighter sentences and reduced fines should in fact be viewed as Aggravating factors and the perpetrator if disclosing stories like these should in fact receive a longer sentence.

Reason being , coming from a disadvantaged background and having first hand knowledge of hardship and violence should in fact be MORE reasons not to repeat that kind of behaviour.

Either way it should not be used to mitigate crimes like these, used to overshadow the crime itself and overshadow the rights of the victims.

I think the Justice system has lost it's way a little since everyone has a choice whether they commit crime or not.

If you do then you should accept the full consequences/punishment that the law demands irrespective of any hard luck/sob story.

People need to take responsibility for their actions and not just expect a watered down, wishy washy, bleedin heart Liberal Justice system to let them off the hook with a slap on the wrists and a small fine or for more serious crimes a month's stay in 5 star prison and then the hardship of having to wear an electronic tag.

World's gone bleedin Mad..............!!!!







.

:kiss::flowers::clap1: