ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   600 Babies bumped offin Furness? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=274308)

the truth 06-03-2015 12:28 AM

600 Babies bumped offin Furness?
 
Just in case the full horror of this sub human story hasn't been spoken about...id like to remind you....600 babies over a decade were effectively killed off in the furness maternity ward by nurses hellbent on natural births only? this was covered up for years and continues to be....the usual culture of secrecy cover ups, politicians sucking up to the nurses unions to not lose their enormous support etc and unbelievably not one person has yet been sacked over this.....meanwhile instead of covering this ongoing disaster,,,,the feminazi bbc was busy talking about how hard it is for female lineswomen when some drunks shout get your tits out.......600 dead babies Versus get your tits out....shows how insane the loony liberal bbc is........this also underlines how unaccountable big government and public bodies are...same with teaching same with cops.....theyre never guilty rarely sacked and never sent to jail....

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-cumbria-31532749

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2...deaths-cumbria

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...iry-finds.html


how could the private sector be any worse than this?

rip to those 600 sweet innocent babies and may the offending nurses and all those who helped support this mass killing and cover up, burn in hell

Kizzy 06-03-2015 12:52 AM

Links?...

arista 06-03-2015 05:21 AM

This was when New Labour ran this nation

user104658 06-03-2015 07:11 AM

Not to point out the obvious, but all of those links state that between 2004 and 2013 they are looking into failings that have lead to the death of 11 babies.

Not that 11 is "ok", if 11 babies have died needlessly then that is still horrifying, but... Err... 600 seems to be a slight exaggeration?

Kizzy 06-03-2015 08:40 AM

It's designed to rock public confidence in the NHS is all.

Glenn. 06-03-2015 08:44 AM

So 11 babies then? Not 600

billy123 06-03-2015 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 7628341)
This was when New Labour ran this nation

Do you even bother to read the links or do you just spout this nonsense without even thinking?

user104658 06-03-2015 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobnot (Post 7628438)
Do you even bother to read the links or do you just spout this nonsense without even thinking?

Arista is an AI chatbot, he generates responses based on random keywords in the text. There's no point getting mad.

smudgie 06-03-2015 10:12 AM

Tragic.
Heads should roll, nobody has been made accountable for these senseless deaths.
Doctors and nurses should be working together and not against each other.

Plenty of coverage on this on the BBC..the story broke before the sexism in football.
Our local news covers the Cumbria area, there has been talk of 200 deaths and 600 was mentioned.
Not sure which numbers are true.

the truth 06-03-2015 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smudgie (Post 7628483)
Tragic.
Heads should roll, nobody has been made accountable for these senseless deaths.
Doctors and nurses should be working together and not against each other.

Plenty of coverage on this on the BBC..the story broke before the sexism in football.
Our local news covers the Cumbria area, there has been talk of 200 deaths and 600 was mentioned.
Not sure which numbers are true.

600 excess baby deaths....glad to know someone on here cares about babies being effectively bumped off....these sadistic murdering psychopathic midwives should be hung from the rafters

Tom4784 06-03-2015 03:40 PM

Good thing, they would have probably ended up being Benefit scroungers or worse, GIRLS :fist:

the truth 06-03-2015 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dezzy (Post 7629006)
Good thing, they would have probably ended up being Benefit scroungers or worse, GIRLS :fist:

your sick comment has been reported shame on you:nono:

arista 06-03-2015 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bobnot (Post 7628438)
Do you even bother to read the links or do you just spout this nonsense without even thinking?


the Nov 2008 one
yes


New Labour

JoshBB 06-03-2015 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arista (Post 7629038)
the Nov 2008 one
yes


New Labour

New labour are idiots, thankfully they are starting to change their policies to ones that make sense. I may even vote for them in the future (under certain circumstances)

the truth 06-03-2015 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoshBB (Post 7629213)
New labour are idiots, thankfully they are starting to change their policies to ones that make sense. I may even vote for them in the future (under certain circumstances)

good post , one day perhaps but that day is years away they still haven't learn enough from the wasteful cover up overly politically correct dogma

user104658 06-03-2015 06:17 PM

Seriously truth, link to something that backs up your figure of 600 deaths? The links you have provided say no such thing. I'm not saying it isn't true but you're just throwing out numbers and accusations and expecting people to take your word for it and as you are so often full of ****, that's really a lot to expect.

GiRTh 06-03-2015 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 7629382)
Seriously truth, link to something that backs up your figure of 600 deaths? The links you have provided say no such thing. I'm not saying it isn't true but you're just throwing out numbers and accusations and expecting people to take your word for it and as you are so often full of ****, that's really a lot to expect.

:joker:

the truth 06-03-2015 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier (Post 7629382)
Seriously truth, link to something that backs up your figure of 600 deaths? The links you have provided say no such thing. I'm not saying it isn't true but you're just throwing out numbers and accusations and expecting people to take your word for it and as you are so often full of ****, that's really a lot to expect.

thanks for the abuse that says a lot more about you than me, utterly shameful:nono: 600 excess deaths is stating in one of those links, look for it yourself

the truth 06-03-2015 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GiRTh (Post 7629439)
:joker:

yes babies being killed off and youre laughing your head off? whats wrong with you

GiRTh 06-03-2015 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the truth (Post 7629457)
yes babies being killed off and youre laughing your head off? whats wrong with you

Prove that 600 babies have being killed off and I will stop laughing till then - :joker:

the truth 06-03-2015 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GiRTh (Post 7629460)
Prove that 600 babies have being killed off and I will stop laughing till then - :joker:

sick....read my previous posts , it states 600 excess deaths in the maternity wards

GiRTh 06-03-2015 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the truth (Post 7629466)
sick....read my previous posts , it states 600 excess deaths in the maternity wards

Where? And dont expect me to read your links. Post it on the forum.

the truth 06-03-2015 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GiRTh (Post 7629472)
Where? And dont expect me to read your links. Post it on the forum.

if youre too lazy to read the links then you've no right to spout your absurd opinions, you simply do not care about this tragedy, shameful:nono::nono::nono:

GiRTh 06-03-2015 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the truth (Post 7629491)
if youre too lazy to read the links then you've no right to spout your absurd opinions, you simply do not care about this tragedy, shameful:nono::nono::nono:

It says 11 in two of the links and gives no figure in the third. I've read your links and they seem to be somewhat inaccurate hence why I dont want you to tell me to look thru your links..

Mokka 06-03-2015 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GiRTh (Post 7629496)
It says 11 in two of the links and gives no figure in the third. I've read your links and they seem to be somewhat inaccurate hence why I dont want you to tell me to look thru your links..

Gotta agree with GiRTH here

I have read all three articles and even did word searches fore the various ways to write the number 600 and it doesn't occur.
Now to address the issue... Deaths in Childbirth occur in regular hospitals as well, and are also down to human error sometimes... but covering up the issue is not a good thing as is being indicated in these cases. That being said... the numbers seem to be not as high as your claim, and I would venture deaths of babies in hospitals would probably rival these numbers overall.


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.