.
 

.

TiBB Staff is an automatic thing that is sent to a member after a warning or infraction is given.

If anyone ever has a problem with a infraction/warning then just PM a mod or admin to discuss it.

Well, we were told to reply to it with queries! :worry:

Do y'all check messages sent to Tibb staff?

i have replied to that account loads of times and never got a reply

and i don't think mods should be allowed to hide behind it tbh :umm2: like if you as a mod personally feel an infraction is deserved why do it anonymously?

Mods don't see the messages or have access to it but Admin read the message and one of Josy or James normally posts any responses that come through in the Towers section

I would honestly never infract people if they knew it was me, it opens you up to far too much sh*t, accusations of vendetta, bias etc. for it to ever be worth it

I see. :shocked: Thanks for the insight, that explains everything, if another mod gives the infraction it wouldn't really make sense for Josy or James to figure out if the person replying is telling the truth or not, since they didn't give it. :worry: That is an awful system tbh.

then you should not be a mod :nono:

It's not chosen to be anonymous. That's just how the system is.

Just don't do any infractable offences, and you'll be fine :)

it is though? that is the whole point of it lmao

It's not really clear what infractable and what's not tho.

ew i just read my posts back they make it look like i really have a problem with/care about this when i don't at all bye

Read the rules :idc:

I have examples of when things which either arent in the rules or aren't made clear have got me in trouble but I fear I may be infracted or even banned if I post.

The whole point of this thread is that sometimes people seem to be breaking the rules when they are really not, so they get punished and don't get a chance to explain why they didn't deserve it. :joker:

It would though cos as Admin they're meant to be checking that the Mods are doing their job, which they do do. Infractions can and do get reversed and they often get discussed at least if they're contentious

Maybe I wouldn't be if it wasn't anonymous, but it is and so I am :idc:

Yeah, the number of warnings/infractions I get that say....

"baiting"
"baiting again"
"baiting AGAIN"
"stop this baiting now"

is ridiculous.

I bait like once every six months when I'm bored. :idc: The rest of the time I'm joking with people and they take it as a joke. :hmph:

jess u do know if you get loads of infractions that leads towards a ban. I'm not going to say the words but you were quite nasty towards mock on the lounge and on someones wall. but it's only a ban and you were banned for 1 day :laugh:

Yeah, there's a lot of jokes being taken out of context. :umm2: They can't just say "don't joke".

There have been times when people have been Infracted and other mods question it because they have understood the context wrong, and then the infraction is reversed.

Of course if someone is Infracted and in turn is banned they are going to try and 'explain' what they meant to try and get out of it.

I know, I was banned from a build up of infractions, one of them was a 100% wrongful infraction. This thread isn't about the ban, I don't care about being banned for one day, this is about a bigger issue.

You all act like we infract people for fun though, it's not like trawling through all the sh*te in the Lounge or wherever is enjoyable, it's mainly when reports start coming through that Mods respond to it

But what if it's a genuine grievance? :fist: You can't lump everyone together andy!!! :smug: