They should nominate jack for the first three weeks
 

Get him to use all his immunities in the first three weeks. If they are smart that is

I agree, it's the best way to get rid of his advantage and level the playing field.

Yeah. Flush out the passes.

i wood agree. Why should he be given three passes? :mad:

I don't think this group of contestants are that bright

I doubt he would go even if they did

They should nominate him and then he doesn't use it because he's cocky and then he's evicted lolol

There are plenty housemates I would like to see out before Jack, even without his free passes. I don't think they will waste their votes on him at all, why would they. He basically has a pass to the final

I would flush them out if I was in there, and if the Housemates wouldn't join me on that then I would steal some food from him off the shopping list, and just make him have to put up with a lot of **** from me if I was in there.

Yes I'd be a very evil person on BB.

Simples....it will almost be arrogant of him not to use it and I would think they would all norm him purely on the fact that he can save himself..:joker:

Nominating for having immuninty passes would be the most cowardly and pathetic vote in BB history

So he has no immunities later on so its even play for them all, hence if they have brain cells they would make sure he is nominated the first 3 weeks so he can use them up. If they like they can stop nominating him then at least then he will be as vulnerable as the rest

Danny is that you?:umm2:

But if it means that they have a better chance of getting him to use them all early then they will probably do it anyway.

But that would mean more deserving candidates for nomination were ignored for positive discrimination voting for Jack.

Lets look at what could happen:

Everyone has 2 votes and for the first 3 weeks all use one of those votes to target jack.

That makes each nomination that Jack makes automatically more valuable, because he always has 2 effective nominations where they have one. He could quite easily target those he wants out, and there is a good chance it will happen.

The alternative is to not get sucked in to BB's trap, accept he will be in the final 5 and leave it up to the audience. If they don't like him, he will be voted out first or won't win anyway. This way, they are at least making all their nominations count.

If you are in the house to play the game... then yes you should,

but, the BBUK audience have always frowned on and voted out people they see as "game players" so then if you are there to play the game and you have half a brain to consider how you come across to those actually voting you out... you shouldn't

If you are in there just to have a fun summer and don't care who wins *cough no one* ... then you should only vote for him if you hate having him around

the third option is the one I would be selling to the crowds :wink: