ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB16 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=663)
-   -   Nominations regarding age? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=277483)

Jake. 18-05-2015 09:10 PM

Nominations regarding age?
 
Do you think they should be allowed?

divergent 18-05-2015 09:11 PM

not a valid reason at all, poor eileen's just a scapegoat

Headie 18-05-2015 09:12 PM

Justice4Eileen

Scrap the noms I say

Drew. 18-05-2015 09:13 PM

Definitely not if its the only reason

Jay. 18-05-2015 09:14 PM

not at all, she acts younger than most of them in there :umm2:

Heaven = Winner 18-05-2015 09:14 PM

It's so annoying ffs

JoshBB 18-05-2015 09:14 PM

No. It's ageism and discrimination tbh. Totally unfair. Will probably be tactically voting to save Eileen if I can.

Kizzy 18-05-2015 09:15 PM

It's because she moaned about being woken up... like jim did constantly so she might win :idc:

Margarine. 18-05-2015 09:16 PM

they wouldn't allow

"Sorry Jack but you're fatter than me so I think you might get annoyed if I eat your crisps in week five"

same thing really

Ross. 18-05-2015 09:16 PM

Nope, not a good enough reason.

Tom4784 18-05-2015 09:18 PM

It's a weak copout and it shouldn't be allowed.

just thinkin 18-05-2015 09:18 PM

So unfair to eileen.....she's one of the good ones...thought it very dramatic and sneaky of jadw to blame the other girls for her nom of cristian too...gone right off her

Lostie! 18-05-2015 09:19 PM

Nominations based on age, and hypothetical situations that may never happen, should not at all be allowed.

Jake. 18-05-2015 09:22 PM

This is ridiculous, what sheep they are

reece(: 18-05-2015 09:23 PM

No I find it shocking, they should put a bunch of older HMs in and allow them to nominate the young ones on that reason, I bet they'd kick OFF.

Withano 18-05-2015 09:24 PM

Exactly what I was thinking, of course not.

just thinkin 18-05-2015 09:26 PM

Danny voted jade...wow. ..accorsing to her he was made into her

smudgie 18-05-2015 09:30 PM

:nono: Disgusting for it to be allowed as a reason.

Ant. 18-05-2015 09:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Margarine. (Post 7783728)
they wouldn't allow

"Sorry Jack but you're fatter than me so I think you might get annoyed if I eat your crisps in week five"

same thing really

omfg

RichardG 18-05-2015 09:31 PM

No it's a silly reason and I'm surprised it was allowed.

lily. 18-05-2015 09:32 PM

No. Those noms were ridiculous.

But, CH5 ought to have more of a range of ages in the mix. She is 51 and the next youngest is 30. Hardly a variety. I like her and I don't think it should matter how old she is. Surely it is her personality that counts.

susie q 18-05-2015 09:32 PM

No it shouldnt be allowed, she really was just the easy target for them. I hope she gets the biggest cheer on friday. I shall be voting for Sarah mainly because I dont want another fake romance but wouldnt be bothered if adjoa went instead.

waylander1973 18-05-2015 09:42 PM

It should not be a reason for a nomination, but what can you to about it.:shrug:

Daniel-X 18-05-2015 09:45 PM

I think big brother should have either made them give a valid reason for nominating her or make them pick another housemate. Age ain't a reason why someone should be voted

zakman440 18-05-2015 09:46 PM

Absolutely not. The housemates who nominated her should be ashamed of themselves and Big Brother needs to get tougher with the housemates on the reasons they can and can't give.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:45 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.