why is this eviction not VTS?
 

With 4 housemates being evicted viewers should be voting who they want to keep this week

VTS is ridiculously overrated and doesn't do what people think it does. In this instance in particular, I think we'd get the same result.

I genuinely don't think it'd affect the result that much. Harriet and Danny would stay and that would probably be the worst outcome of them all for me, so in this instance I'm ok with it being vote to evict .

because BBUK love making a series rubbish.

Producers are stupid. They get more money in the short term but in the long run a lot less viewers and a lot less votes.

First and foremost the issue is with the pool of nominees, it should be the entire house. But then you are right, it should be a vote to save.

Then this twist would work. As it is, it's going to be another series ruiner. Again.

How to get rid of Danny, Chloe and Sarah (she's dull now)? VTS, surely.

lbr, the real issue is that we are about to have six evictees in two weeks, only one of which was ever nominated :alien:

Why is this eviction even taking place?

Why are the producers so mentally ****ed up?

VTE is better in this instance with the housemates that are up for eviction, which means we can get rid of Sarah and Danny, shame Jack used his immunity pass

Danny won't go. This forum does not hold enough power to evict him.

In the case of it being VTS, i am not sure how much difference it would make in a 4 out of 6 eviction.

HOWEVER, in my opinion for this type of eviction they should have put the WHOLE HOUSE up! WITH a vote to SAVE. Thus getting rid of the 4 the public have the least interest in and replacing them. (its called common sense something the producers are strongly lacking in)
I am dumfounded by the producers trail of thought on this.