ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB16 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=663)
-   -   Slick Vic Should Sue Helen For Slander (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=281525)

Lister of Smeg 19-06-2015 10:27 PM

Slick Vic Should Sue Helen For Slander
 
Telling lies about the slick man is not on :nono:

DrunkerThanMoses 19-06-2015 10:28 PM

didnt danny bring it up?

Denver 19-06-2015 10:28 PM

As I said she never mentioned his name so he can't prove anything

Marsh. 19-06-2015 10:29 PM

He'll have to sell a hell of a lot of coke for the court fees.

rusticgal 19-06-2015 10:29 PM

She should be kicked out for her comments...it was an appalling thing to say and undefendable.
They have thrown others out for far less...

joeysteele 19-06-2015 10:29 PM

The option is open for him to sue her if she is wrong for sure.
She has said it on a public show,if he can disprove it,then he has the evidence she said it.

Absorption 19-06-2015 10:30 PM

I imagine the production team was torn between their "TV gold" and the prospect of legal action. I'm not sure that the lack of his name would be enough defence given the context of the conversation.

Lstan 19-06-2015 10:31 PM

Nah
talking about him has extended his 15 minutes of fame,
which was 45 minutes too long to begin with

Denver 19-06-2015 10:32 PM

If he was to sue her wouldn't he have to take a drug test? Therefore if any drugs are found in his system it would be thrown out of court

smudgie 19-06-2015 10:33 PM

The fact that she has backtracked and said she knows no such thing really should strengthen his case somewhat.

Lister of Smeg 19-06-2015 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Absorption (Post 7905275)
I imagine the production team was torn between their "TV gold" and the prospect of legal action. I'm not sure that the lack of his name would be enough defence given the context of the conversation.

Exactly he definitely has a case not out right saying his name isn't enough of a defence against when she was quite clearly talking about him.

GypsyGoth 19-06-2015 10:35 PM

It was BB's choice or rather C5's choice to show it. There is loads of libelous stuff said by the housemates, it's up to C5 BB not to broadcast it. So I think they are the ones at fault, not Helen.

Lister of Smeg 19-06-2015 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by smudgie (Post 7905327)
The fact that she has backtracked and said she knows no such thing really should strengthen his case somewhat.

Exactly she was talking out of her arse while dragging someone else's name through the dirt :nono:

Rob! 19-06-2015 10:37 PM

He is :joker: check his Twitter :hehe:

Lister of Smeg 19-06-2015 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GypsyGoth (Post 7905362)
It was BB's choice or rather C5's choice to show it. There is loads of libelous stuff said by the housemates, it's up to C5 BB not to broadcast it. So I think they are the ones at fault, not Helen.

It came out of Helen's mouth she should be made to live with the consequences if it is a complete lie.

GiRTh 19-06-2015 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joeysteele (Post 7905266)
The option is open for him to sue her if she is wrong for sure.
She has said it on a public show,if he can disprove it,then he has the evidence she said it.

The burden of proof lies with him if he sues her. Anyway its another in a long line of misdemeanors by this poisonous ******. Hopefully this one will finish her for good cuz if he wins then I hope he cleans her out.

sampvt 19-06-2015 10:40 PM

To sue Helen for those comments he must first prove he is innocent and that could be hard given his track record. I doubt he would want to go there as skeletons might start falling out if he has dabbled and someone knows about it, who knows but normally there is no smoke without fire.

Lister of Smeg 19-06-2015 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rob! (Post 7905384)
He is :joker: check his Twitter :hehe:

Good :laugh:

Lister of Smeg 19-06-2015 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 7905424)
To sue Helen for those comments he must first prove he is innocent and that could be hard given his track record. I doubt he would want to go there as skeletons might start falling out if he has dabbled and someone knows about it, who knows but normally there is no smoke without fire.

Hard to prove ? All he has to do is take a drugs test .

Denver 19-06-2015 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lister of Smeg (Post 7905446)
Hard to prove ? All he has to do is take a drugs test .

A drugs test which with any type of drug found would be thrown out of court

GiRTh 19-06-2015 10:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 7905424)
To sue Helen for those comments he must first prove he is innocent and that could be hard given his track record. I doubt he would want to go there as skeletons might start falling out if he has dabbled and someone knows about it, who knows but normally there is no smoke without fire.

This. All Helen has to do is pick holes in his case. She doesnt have to prove anything even though she said it on TV.

Amy Jade 19-06-2015 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by adamski94 (Post 7905250)
As I said she never mentioned his name so he can't prove anything

Yes she did lol

Absorption 19-06-2015 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lister of Smeg (Post 7905369)
Exactly she was talking out of her arse while dragging someone else's name through the dirt :nono:

Nawww, she was just "sayin' it like it is"...or maybe it was 'banter'... :joker:

karezza 19-06-2015 10:48 PM

Only if what she said is true.

GiRTh 19-06-2015 11:47 PM

The exact quote was - He can ******ing die for all I care'. What a peach eh?


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.