Why did it take Big Brother so long to warn Marc for abusive comment and harrassing ?
 

Marc has been abusing housemates all series.Surely BB saw the c u m b u c k e t,the slut and I think maybe the slag comments as abusive and surely BB saw Marc picking up Chloe and slamming her down against her will and gyrating his pelvis around her as to hint at sex as he was really close to her as harassment.

So why did it take so long for them to say it was in part because of his abusive comments and harassing HM s when it;s been very clear he's done all those things.

Is it because he was the favourite of audience or because he was a Man that they only said it after they warned a Female who has been taken on and spoken back to more ?

I cannot understand why he was not given a formal warning earlier in the show. Significant last night that he told BB he would try to stop not that he would and I think he feels that in truth they want him to continue with same.

I have not seen his other TV show and know nothing about him but presumably BB had some idea of how he would interact before sending him in they certainly did with Helen so I guess they think this is what we want to watch.

When he goes completely OTT with his sexual comments towards the female HMs there fathers boyfriends or brothers are not there. I hope some of them are when he is evicted this would make good TV.!

ah, sure it's only 'banter'. If I hear that word again.......

It made a mockery of it really, he's been harassing and using abusive and derogatory language since the day he went in and passing it off as banter, yet BB said those were the reasons he was being warned for, he admitted he was antagonizing Brian therefore he was trying to get a reaction (my daughter says this happens in her class, the kids caught doing it are reprimanded and have to go on an anti bullying course)

It's a shame really because i wonder if Marc really is an arsehole or has he been fed by the producers:shrug:

Some of the stuff he has said previously may have warranted a warning, but I really do not think last night he deserved one at all.

Also why is 'psycho' suddenly such an awful word when Helens been calling Brian it for days and nothings been said til now :suspect:

Marc was warned about his behaviour before, and I remember BB saying something on the lines that he had been told off a few times about it, even though we weren't shown the telling offs.

Just an FYI he didn't get a formal warning. :pipe:

I didn't see anything he did last night that deserved a warning..C5 is just covering their ass in case of legal action by Belo..who the one who has been rude loud aggressive and dishonest since the Chloe nomination.

Because he's a plant.

That's exactly what i think Vicky, he has warranted warnings on other occasions, yet last night it was ridiculous, he even looked a little confused, especially when BB told him the reason.

BB has let it get out of hand and now they are quickly trying to cover their backs, that's my opinion.

What many seemed to have missed and is the key to it all. Intent. It really doesn't matter what you say in situations, its what you intend to achieve by saying them.

Marc was reinforcing Helen's goading of Brian so it warranted an instant warning, simple as that.