How should he have played the game.
 

Obviously he didn't play the perfect game, but we loved watching him regardless.

I know a lot of people think he could have done things differently, well let's hear it.

More than happy to learn from BB experts :)

we? :suspect:

Myself and many others.

He shouldn't of stooped to personal insults and he shouldn't of sided with Helen. Take those two things away and Marc would of been a winner.

Yourself and one other person.

Do you have an opinion on the subject?

He probably aligned himself way too much with the so called legends, letting them influence his judgement on nominating and such, that might have been his downfall, or maybe he just wasn't liked as much as he and some of his fans may have believed.

My opinion is that not all of us loved watching him

Thanks, I'm sure that would have helped him.

I agree, the Helen thing played a huge role.

I don't think he should have done anything differently.

Had he ignored Helen he would not have been being true to himself,Nikki and Brian were never that supportive to his way anyway,even without Helen.

He stayed true to all he said he would do in the house,he did it, coming out because of that is to his credit and what he managed to do, that few others could, was expose the bad sides to some of them,especially Danny.

Even as to some of the has beens too,Like Aisleyne for instance.

Vote to save and he likely could have won this, vote to evict removes often the very best of housemates due in part to pathetic organised campaigns.

I doubt he could have done more than stay true to himself and he took all the people he came across at face value and then judged them.

Riled them. But in a less passive aggressive and demeaning manor. Could and probably would have won then.

he played it fine. Should have been vote to save.

If he didn't side with Helen, didn't join in with the aggressive behavior/mannerisms and didn't seclude himself from the main group of HMs then he would still be in there.

I'd take a housemate who's true to himself any day over a fake one.

Vote to save was unfair, he has just as many haters as fans.

He obviously did not. First time up and gone.

That is the posters point!! It did not.

But he was not true to himself. It was a failed gameplan.

And he failed.

Thanks for explaining it to me :)

VTE or VTS is only unfair when it goes against voters faves.

It should always stick to one or the other.

Glad you took it in the second time, 007!

Yes it should, those who supported him could do nothing really to avoid him going in vote to evict.

That was exclusively down in vote to evict,to those who wanted him out for whatever reasons
In vote to save they could then have done nothing except vote for their own favourite,rather than destroy someone elses favourites' chances.

How was he not true to himself?

No really, thank you.

In other words he should have been a meek and mild arselicker then he'de have gone far , but , imo he played it just fine , just people took him too seriously

Because in his interview, he said "it was a plan to annoy" and he never meant any harm to anyone and he liked them all. That is F A K E.