Originally Posted by Firegazer (Post 7979875)

Did anyone even read my post? :suspect:

Originally Posted by just thinkin (Post 7979879)

i did..and I agree.

but the minute they threw the four safe people out two weeks into the show, who weren't nominated and who were safe.... I knew not to trust anything about the editing of the show. If you remember chloe did not even feature in those two weeks - now she seems to be the villain of the series (she's not). If she was that argumentative during the whole 8 weeks, then the other housemates would not like her - she's the only housemate that the all DO like however, and has barely been nominated by anyone - she would be safe this week also only for nasty nick buying his way to the final and selling her out.

Soo... in conclusion - if everybody in the house loves chloe - she must be doing something great and they all like her - if they are suddenly showing her being argumentative this week, you need to look at what they are not showing......the rest of them being argumentative a lot more. After all if she's the nicest in the house and she's being 'bold' now, what does it say about the others.

delighted she walks away with some money.

Originally Posted by BBUKAUSFAN (Post 7979900)

I actual like the Chole we are seeing now compared to the one we seen a last week and back.

It a shame they had to destroy the series with so many twists to grab viewers and take less shine of potentially amazing housemates with stories to tell.

Originally Posted by jaxie (Post 7979946)

It's easy to blame the edit when a favourite falls from Grace but also its kind of a cop out because an edit can't put words into a housemates mouth nor change their actions. Chloe's words and actions are all her own. The reason she is shown more is because she perked right up when money came into the equation.

Originally Posted by jaxie (Post 7979946)

It's easy to blame the edit when a favourite falls from Grace but also its kind of a cop out because an edit can't put words into a housemates mouth nor change their actions. Chloe's words and actions are all her own. The reason she is shown more is because she perked right up when money came into the equation.

Originally Posted by just thinkin (Post 7979953)

are you serious - do you know what an edit is? you can take one persons question in the morning - get another persons comment from the evening, and use that as an answer. don't you ever see talking dogs on youtube - you can also cut out 98% of an argument and leave in the 2% that is 'out of context' to make somebody look bad..... the very fact that they weren't able to change clothes for the last few days makes the 'editing' even easier

Originally Posted by jaxie (Post 7979980)

I am completely serious. An edit isn't going to put the words it's selfish to take the money in her mouth. An edit isn't going to show her taking the money when she didn't. It's ridiculous to blame the edit for the things people are disliking about her. It's fine if you want to like her, I liked Jack even when others didn't but don't try to justify it with a white wash over the facts because that would be as dishonest as she is.

Originally Posted by REDCROP (Post 7980004)

She's not been edited badly....she's been a nasty cow from the get go.....mostly she's just been clever at hiding it....

We saw exactly what she is the night Marc arrived.....he was a new housemate entering an established group of friends and trying to impress...he made a wise crack about her thinking he was being funny....it back fired because he didn't know her well enough and assumed she would get the humour ...Jade and Harry always understood his humour and laughed as loud as he did so he wasn't doing anything SO SO bad when you look back at it..but he def mis judged the situation and felt stupid afterwards

But the way she responded was shocking and way out of proportion and far more disturbing then the offensive joke...she verbally abused him, swore at him like some low life, threatened to attack him and then threw a glass at him....before going off to the diary room knowing that Danny would turn on him...If someone says something she doesn't like or she doesn't understand she reacts by verbally and physically attacking them ?...BAD NEWS

Just like when she was nominated the first time she caused a sh-t storm with her passive aggressive reaction which resulted in Brian and Helen going for each other and the whole house exploding....she lights the touch paper then sits back and watching it all go BANG

You don't need editing...you only need 5 seconds and a pair of eyes to see what she is

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 7980017)

They are doing what they can to protect golden Balls Danny and get him to the line by editing his competitors out of the show. They need to get Chloe and then maybe Joel out and he will win but my sneaking feeling for jack is growing by the day.

Chloe is being edited quite a lot but they are not lip synching her, she is actually saying and doing these things, its just difficult to ignore when its so explosive what she is up to. She is evil and its showing when the money claws are out. Typical chav and scammer game player.

Originally Posted by jaxie (Post 7979980)

I am completely serious. An edit isn't going to put the words it's selfish to take the money in her mouth. An edit isn't going to show her taking the money when she didn't. It's ridiculous to blame the edit for the things people are disliking about her. It's fine if you want to like her, I liked Jack even when others didn't but don't try to justify it with a white wash over the facts because that would be as dishonest as she is.

Originally Posted by REDCROP (Post 7980020)

Can someone explain to me how you know BB want Danny to win and WHY do they want him to win...why wud Danny winning be better for BB then Jack or Christian or Harry ?....

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 7980012)

harry laughed as loud as he did:joker::joker::joker::joker:

what planet are you on?

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 7980032)

Ive got 20/20 vision and when my hearing aids are turned on, I don't miss a thing, lol. Maybe I don't have blinkers on because I am not blinded by a fervent need to support my fav as he was ejected last week and all the rest left in are pond life. I don't need to be biased so being impartial is a great thing when making observations.

You should maybe take note of how Danny is being given storylines, good edits and his main competition is being decimated as we speak. Then you might pick up on stuff.

Danny is a proven media and fame ***** which makes him food and fodder for ch5 and the prods future plans for money spinners as he is good looking and has a personality as opposed to being a blob or a cornflake. Does that help ??????

Originally Posted by sampvt (Post 7980032)

Ive got 20/20 vision and when my hearing aids are turned on, I don't miss a thing, lol. Maybe I don't have blinkers on because I am not blinded by a fervent need to support my fav as he was ejected last week and all the rest left in are pond life. I don't need to be biased so being impartial is a great thing when making observations.

You should maybe take note of how Danny is being given storylines, good edits and his main competition is being decimated as we speak. Then you might pick up on stuff.

Danny is a proven media and fame ***** which makes him food and fodder for ch5 and the prods future plans for money spinners as he is good looking and has a personality as opposed to being a blob or a cornflake. Does that help ??????