what is more selfish?
 

Taking money or expecting people not to take the money.

It should be a free for all at the moment with hm taking whatever they can for the show, they all have as much right to the cash as the next one.

Surely if they are all so close as that stupid loud mouthed idiot chloe says then they should be willing for their mates to get whatever they can out of it...................................


unless of course they have been screeching about loyalty etc etc....

Expecting others not to take the money while taking money yourself :smug:

Either is fine by me so long as you are not preaching to others to behave differently.

oh yes, that really is the lowest of the low.:nono:

well nick spent 5,000 to buy a slot to the final
joel took 2,500 to buy a miniature pizza that he didn't even eat
so fair play to chloe for getting 5,000 (that was dependent on somebody else's wrong answer) to spend wisely when she leaves the house.

7,500 already spent on nothing
5,000 to help Chloe's future

can't see anything wrong with that.

Neither.
This house and it's occupants is not their family, nor their real lifelong friends. You are playing for you and your family. ANY deviation from that line of thinking is just worrying about small minded viewer perception living vicariously through the actions of contestants on a reality show.

:fan:

I think it's fine to take the money as long as you weren't whining about others taking it. Which means it's fine for any of the others but not for Chloe or Danny, and maybe Joel, who did a bit of whining himself at Jack and Sam taking £100 for their suitcases.

This one.