ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB16 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=663)
-   -   Why didn't they let Chloe go? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=284414)

Jack_ 09-07-2015 10:25 PM

Why didn't they let Chloe go?
 
Unless it's someone that desperately needs to be kept around then fifteen ****ing minutes is more than enough time outside of the house to justify not allowing them back in, they should've let the bloody bore walk and cancelled this week's eviction so Harry and Jack can take their rightful places in the final :bored:

rusticgal 09-07-2015 10:26 PM

Because she was just upset...she didn't really want to go.

RodHull 09-07-2015 10:27 PM

There was a brief glimmer of hope but no sadly not... TBF I would think the tinker men at C5s production team are already lining up a week of redemption of Chloe edits where her and Danny are painted to be BFFs and total saints

Jack_ 09-07-2015 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rusticgal (Post 7982495)
Because she was just upset...she didn't really want to go.

And that would've been fine after maybe five minutes, but fifteen minutes in the camera runs/maybe outside probably talking to producers (I know there's loads of outside contact these days but still) is long enough

My point is she's not worth keeping so just let her go and let Harry and Jack take their rightful final places :clap1:

karezza 09-07-2015 10:37 PM

She's needed for tomorrow's eviction.

joeysteele 09-07-2015 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 7982506)
And that would've been fine after maybe five minutes, but fifteen minutes in the camera runs/maybe outside probably talking to producers (I know there's loads of outside contact these days but still) is long enough

My point is she's not worth keeping so just let her go and let Harry and Jack take their rightful final places :clap1:

I agree, I wouldn't have chased after her, I would have just let her know her cases would be following on.

ThriceShy 09-07-2015 11:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 7982490)
Unless it's someone that desperately needs to be kept around then fifteen ****ing minutes is more than enough time outside of the house to justify not allowing them back in, they should've let the bloody bore walk and cancelled this week's eviction so Harry and Jack can take their rightful places in the final :bored:

That 15 minutes isn't relevant because it didn't happen inside the house.

Jack_ 09-07-2015 11:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 7982665)
That 15 minutes isn't relevant because it didn't happen inside the house.

:pat:

ThriceShy 09-07-2015 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 7982506)
And that would've been fine after maybe five minutes, but fifteen minutes in the camera runs/maybe outside probably talking to producers (I know there's loads of outside contact these days but still) is long enough

My point is she's not worth keeping so just let her go and let Harry and Jack take their rightful final places :clap1:

I am sure in BB9 that Lisa spent about 40 minutes in a production portacabin, well away from the house, when she did a runner and they let her back in.

I think you are being a bit harsh really. And anyway, I want to see her booed on her eviction.

camertone 09-07-2015 11:50 PM

maybe she was assured by producers that she is liked a lot on the outside and convinced her to reenter house.

REDCROP 10-07-2015 12:09 AM

If Chloe wins this thing then that's me finished with it...will stop following the programme ....last year was scraping the slime coated floor under the barrel with Helen but for me Chloe is Helen without the honesty ....just been watching BOTS and couldn't believe how all those Corn fed idiots on there fell so easily for the little miss workhouse routine ...frustrating as f-ck

REDCROP 10-07-2015 12:19 AM

So many superficial people who miss the whole point of what was so ugly about Chloes behaviour....The way she made it all about people resenting her being happy by having some money ...so manipulating and scheming ....It wasn't about the money ...It could have been 5 quid ...It could have been a banana ...its wasn't about the value of cash it was about deceit and betrayal of someone's faith and trust....I'm no big fan of Danny but I felt for him I really did ...he was in shock...type of shock where your stomach churns....she's awful...really ...

Jack_ 10-07-2015 12:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 7982753)
I am sure in BB9 that Lisa spent about 40 minutes in a production portacabin, well away from the house, when she did a runner and they let her back in.

I think you are being a bit harsh really. And anyway, I want to see her booed on her eviction.

I know, and I disagreed with that too. Even moreso because Lisa was vastly overrated and also largely boring.

ThriceShy 10-07-2015 12:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 7982812)
I know, and I disagreed with that too. Even moreso because Lisa was vastly overrated and also largely boring.

Lisa and mario were good housemates IMO.

Don't you want to see chloe evicted to a cacophony of boos?

MB. 10-07-2015 12:30 AM

You've got a strange definition of 'boring' considering Chloe's pretty much dominated the past couple of highlight shows, but I don't think Harry and Jack need to worry about their final places just yet.

MB. 10-07-2015 12:30 AM

(also because I will not stand for Lisa Appleton shade, not now, not ever)

Jack_ 10-07-2015 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThriceShy (Post 7982814)
Lisa and mario were good housemates IMO.

Don't you want to see chloe evicted to a cacophony of boos?

Mario was hilarious, Lisa was mostly irrelevant.

Not particularly, I'd have rather the eviction were cancelled and we get rid of Chloe and Harry and Jack can rightfully take their places in the final rather than risk going tomorrow night undeservingly.

Jack_ 10-07-2015 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MB. (Post 7982817)
You've got a strange definition of 'boring' considering Chloe's pretty much dominated the past couple of highlight shows, but I don't think Harry and Jack need to worry about their final places just yet.

I knew someone would mention this, I actually put an * next to her name in the OP with what I'm about to say but then deleted it. A week long twist designed to provoke housemates doesn't negate someone's dullard status.

The strange thing is if Chloe had acted like this all the way through the series, I'd have supported her. I'm not complaining at her actions this week, I think they've been hilariously hypocritical but as a housemate it's about ****ing time she did something, but quite frankly it's too little too late and if she thinks she can make an appearance a week before the final and that's enough to deserve to win, well no, sorry, she can do one.

Jason. 10-07-2015 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MB. (Post 7982817)
You've got a strange definition of 'boring' considering Chloe's pretty much dominated the past couple of highlight shows, but I don't think Harry and Jack need to worry about their final places just yet.

I so agree with this. I don't agree with his definition of entertainment. He mentioned Cristian was no longer boring because he piped up for the cameras, three weeks ago, only because he was up for eviction and wanted to get some fake airtime. Not to mention he's done zilch, ever since he survived against Jade. But Chloe's still a bore, when the last few days have been all about her, as have most the threads on this forum.

So confusing. :shrug:

Jack_ 10-07-2015 12:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BB6 (Post 7982833)
I so agree with this. I don't agree with his definition of entertainment. He mentioned Cristian was no longer boring because he piped up for the cameras, three weeks ago, only because he was up for eviction and wanted to get some fake airtime. Not to mention he's done zilch, ever since he survived against Jade. But Chloe's still a bore, when the last few days have been all about her, as have most the threads on this forum.

So confusing. :shrug:

I've already explained this but I'm not doing so again cause you ignore the post and then ask me the same thing three days later

ThriceShy 10-07-2015 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 7982827)
I knew someone would mention this, I actually put an * next to her name in the OP with what I'm about to say but then deleted it. A week long twist designed to provoke housemates doesn't negate someone's dullard status.

The strange thing is if Chloe had acted like this all the way through the series, I'd have supported her. I'm not complaining at her actions this week, I think they've been hilariously hypocritical but as a housemate it's about ****ing time she did something, but quite frankly it's too little too late and if she thinks she can make an appearance a week before the final and that's enough to deserve to win, well no, sorry, she can do one.


To be fair though, we haven't seen much of any of them for the last 6 weeks because BB insisted on putting marc and the legends in and basing the whole show around them. I would have liked to see how it panned out naturally but we will never know.

I actually wish danny and chloe had gone at 4in4out instead of harriet and sarah.

REDCROP 10-07-2015 12:41 AM

Sometimes the smallest incident can make you realise that everything you thought you knew about someone was wrong.....and if you've ever experienced that you will know how cold and sickening that feeling is ....that is what she did to danny on tonight's show ...and I'm not even sure he can even articulate it which would make it even harder to understand ....

Jason. 10-07-2015 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jack_ (Post 7982845)
I've already explained this but I'm not doing so again cause you ignore the post and then ask me the same thing three days later

I didn't ask you anything to begin with. I was replying to a observation MB. made which I happened to agree with. :shrug:
I think you just contradict yourself.
You said on another thread Cristian and Danny are no longer bores anymore and have offered something to the series because they've opened their mouths in recent weeks and have had arguments with Marc and things like that. Not to mention have provided talking points.

Yet Chloe is still bland in your eyes, considering like I said, she's probably been the main talking point over the last few days, and actually has contributed something.

I just thought you'd appreciate her more like you have with Cristian and Danny, who've offered zilch in comparison, especially the former who was pretty much nothing without his petty snog with Jasmine Lennard.



Off topic, but who was evicted on LI?
I didn't catch it, and I CBA to catchup.

REDCROP 10-07-2015 12:51 AM

Harry is the real version of what Chloe is faking ...loyal, honest and intelligent ....a good game player but better executed than Chloe and with integrity ....she's also as mad as a box of frogs and I've never met a mentalist yet who wasn't interesting

REDCROP 10-07-2015 01:09 AM

Surprised by Jack tonight ...i thought he would have gambled the 5 K to focus on the bigger prize like Joel and Harry did ....but I thought he would have struck for gold at the cash bomb task and then again the next day when Nick was the only bidder ...but both times he surrendered his chance so he could try and secure Chloes place in the final instead ....imagine how pissed off he would feel now if he was mature enough to realise that he's been played like a fiddle ....I thought he was supposed to be a sharp gambling man


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.