Sainsbury's: Covers Fully-Clothed Gay Magazine but FHM's Bikini-Clad Model On Show
 

http://i.huffpost.com/gen/3173122/im...M-large570.jpg

[The bizarre arrangement came to light when
a photo was posted on Twitter, captioned:
"Why I don't shop at Sainsbury's anymore.
Naked women OK but Attitude's Pride Heroes cover indecent]

Sainsburys you fecked up
the semi naked mags must be covered


Don't get Political


http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015...n_7768128.html

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CJT872wWwAAiVM_.jpg
Why I don't shop @sainsburys anymore.
Naked women OK but @AttitudeMag Pride Hero's cover indecent.
https://twitter.com/jprinlondon/stat...628736/photo/1

She is hardly 'naked'

semi naked
are the front covers
meant to be covered


The Gay Mag
they are all fully clothed


Its a Feck Up

Looks like it covers that magazine regardless of the cover. Maybe they usually have a naked homoerotic cover? :shrug:

Maybe


but that Twitter Poster link
is going big
and Huff Post
says its wrong.

Cover the semi naked woman as well etc

Mess

i was on about 'Why I don't shop @sainsburys anymore.
Naked women OK but @AttitudeMag Pride Hero's cover indecent.
https://twitter.com/jprinlondon/stat...628736/photo/1'

FACT

sign of the

times

..I don't get this at all, she's wearing a bikini and carrying a surf board, it's a pic that could be seen in any shop/advertising for summer..why would that cover be covered up as well..?...isn't it more that Attitude shouldn't have been covered up..surely the 'campaign' from both Pink and Mumset should be that anything sexually explicit should not be on front covers of magazines so all can be displayed equally without this nonsense...

..but if the magazines want to have front covers that have content that aren't appropriate for children, then Sainsburys, just stop selling magazines altogether and stick to potatoes and baked beans...