BB15 vs BB16
 

Which do you prefer now we've pretty much seen both?

Both received a bad reception by BB fans, but I will say BB16 is worse than BB15 by far. Also Ashleigh > anyone in BB16

Use this one it has a poll

http://cdn.thisisbigbrother.com/cust...r80210_151.gif

BB15 because at least it was entertaining regardless of how painfully bad production was

16.

BB16,

BB15 was messy + the casting was just awful imo

This series casting has been way worse and production has been FAR worse

I never thought that I would hate a series where Nikki, Aisleyne and Charley were housemates :(

BB15 had Ashleigh so it's better than BB16 for me (both are awful tho)

They save it in some way, I still rank 12 worse than this because of them three making an appearance. If it wasn't for them three (and Jasmine) then it would be the worst ever.

Yes

Tragic @ this poll being equal

They both have the same negative points, so we could say this one was worse as BB15 was a trial for a twist series, it didnt work, so they should have left it, but they just am it bigger and badder

I'm really surprised BB15 isn't on 100% :unsure:

Eh?

Aisleyne and Nikki, and all the other legends were one of the reasons why this series sucked. Don't get me wrong, I like Aisleyne.

But, those legends outstayed their welcome, and it just became a mess. The show was constantly about them for 2 weeks, with the original housemates being fillers in their own series, and not getting a second of airtime. It was unfair.

Those 2 weeks were pretty much an All Stars series. Not to mention how unorganised it was. You went from having 3 legends entering the bunker for a week, then extending their stay, then adding Aisleyne, and then the Hotel BB thing. It was just a mess.

I wouldn't have mind, if it had just been the 3 legends going into the bunker for ONE WEEK, as planned. Instead of making them stay longer, and adding a bunch of other ex-housemates too.

Although, seeing Charley again. :lovedup:

BB15

Neither. I suppose if you forced me, id go 16 cos there is a 4/6 chance that the winner will not be vile subhuman scum

It´s hard. Helen (and Pauline) ruined BB15, but producers themselves ruined BB16.

Pauline was one of the few good things about BB15

BB16 is Better!

BB15 had Awful housemates (So does BB16 but not as much), Crap house, Vile winner.

BB16, far better casting. Yeah, it got crap, but the people were much nicer. And I had quite a few favourites.

Nah... She was horrible. And she was the one that gave Helen the final pass to enable her to slide by and win.

BB16's housemates are worse, BB15 had Ashleigh, Danielle and Toya who are a million miles better than anyone in this series, also it was entertaining for the first month. BB16 wasn't/

BB16 had a terrible cast, no big outrageous characters like Toya, Danielle and Biannca and you loved BB15 at the time :unsure:

She was hilarious

BB16 had a stronger female cast but they were all evicted early so didn't really get to shine.

I felt more invested with BB15 and people like Toya, Ashleigh, Danielle etc.

Both are awful but BB16 only had 2 good weeks whereas BB15 had 3 good weeks so BB15 just edges it.

It's hard to say because I have actually quite enjoyed this series and I've been surprised that I've done so. The production values have been the worst of any show I have ever watched and are probably the worst in television history, but it's not been that bad.

I find BB15 really underrated and I really enjoyed it (plus the final two is the most deserving and perfect ever so it gives it more marks for me) so really it's comparing two series I actually liked. And BB16 had the legends whom for a time worked really well, so idk.

I'll say BB15 because of the abysmal production this year.

She was awful I agree