ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   CBB16 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=676)
-   -   So, the first eviction is anyone with 2 noms is up (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=287654)

Beetlejuice 03-09-2015 01:20 PM

So, the first eviction is anyone with 2 noms is up
 
Will it stay that way? (They often change it during a series if someone they like might be in danger)

And am I the only one who just doesn't like that rule. I know it saves the more entertaining figures, but something about it just feels wrong to me.

Niamh. 03-09-2015 01:22 PM

I like that rule and especially in a VTS too, I wish they'd use it for normal BB tbh

Beetlejuice 03-09-2015 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 8115021)
I like that rule and especially in a VTS too, I wish they'd use it for normal BB tbh

I can see the argument for it. And it makes no sense to me why a Celeb series is VTS whilst a normal series is VTE. But that's the bizarre world of Channel 5's Big Brother I guess.

Vanessa 03-09-2015 01:24 PM

I think vote to save is better. Keeps the biggest characters and gets rid of the dullards.

Niamh. 03-09-2015 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beetlejuice (Post 8115023)
I can see the argument for it. And it makes no sense to me why a Celeb series is VTS whilst a normal series is VTE. But that's the bizarre world of Channel 5's Big Brother I guess.

Because they probably paid more for the loud annoying ones so they want their monies worth :laugh:

Oaker 03-09-2015 01:26 PM

Honestly they need to just stick with this now, they keep alternating between 3+ and 2 or more noms and since C5 love big evictions this works better for them.

Niamh. 03-09-2015 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oaker (Post 8115029)
Honestly they need to just stick with this now, they keep alternating between 3+ and 2 or more noms and since C5 love big evictions this works better for them.

Yeah, they're not very transparent with the rules like they used to be, obviously I know why but it just makes me feel dirty and manipulated :'(

Firewire 03-09-2015 01:43 PM

It's fine as long as they stick with it for the rest of the series.

Macie Lightfoot 03-09-2015 02:12 PM

I think it's dumb because if the bar is set so low what's the point of the nomination procedure in the first place?

keith133 03-09-2015 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Macie Lightfoot (Post 8115072)
I think it's dumb because if the bar is set so low what's the point of the nomination procedure in the first place?

i guess just to see what they think of each other and people would complain if there were no nominations

Niamh. 03-09-2015 02:21 PM

Also because it causes tension and paranoia within the group, to me that's more of the point then who goes up and I prefer it this way because you don't get the popular gangs targeting people as easily

Pete. 03-09-2015 02:31 PM

Hate these mega evictions that occur every week. Literally everyone was up the same week in CBB14 and it made people switch off as evictions just weren't interesting enough.

An eviction between Daniel, Farrah and Janice would have been more exciting than this one where Chris seems a cert to go :/

Vanessa 03-09-2015 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pete. (Post 8115089)
Hate these mega evictions that occur every week. Literally everyone was up the same week in CBB14 and it made people switch off as evictions just weren't interesting enough.

An eviction between Daniel, Farrah and Janice would have been more exciting than this one where Chris seems a cert to go :/

Janice is going nowhere, even if she's up every week. She has a massive fanbase and is very entertaining.

Babayaro. 03-09-2015 04:49 PM

Yeah i'm with you on this one. It just doesn't seem fair that Chris is facing eviction with only 2 nominations whilst Farrah recieved 8

Vanessa 03-09-2015 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Babayaro. (Post 8115399)
Yeah i'm with you on this one. It just doesn't seem fair that Chris is facing eviction with only 2 nominations whilst Farrah recieved 8

Maybe not, but i'm fine with it because he's so boring. :hehe:

bots 03-09-2015 05:37 PM

they will just make sure there are at least a minimum number of housemates up to ensure the cash from voting. There will probably be loads up each eviction

Slevin 03-09-2015 05:45 PM

idc. im glad they did it. i was worried those bored were gonna not be up. thank the gods and Chris or the couple need to go. i may not like Farrah or Janice but they need to stay above those 3 sad sacks.

waterhog 03-09-2015 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slevin (Post 8115519)
idc. im glad they did it. i was worried those bored were gonna not be up. thank the gods and Chris or the couple need to go. i may not like Farrah or Janice but they need to stay above those 3 sad sacks.

I got your way of thinking - its about the show and what we want to watch. I agree with you slevin.


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.