Is it OK or not to state wildly ridiculous made up things about public figures,or not
 

Discuss. Debate. Be serious about, etc.

I ask this because I received a warning for posting a well researched and to my knowledge 100% accurate thread about David Cameron being a robot joint of ham controlled by vegan activists (it was in the news yesterday, I just can't find the link right now) and yet, it seems to be perfectly ok for people to post wild, hysterical, nonsense-based statements about other politicians without a word being said about it :shrug:.

So I'm wondering: hypothetically, where is the line drawn?

:joker:

It's drawn on the right... * knocks table over*

a warning?

seriously?

Toy Soldier's gone rogue. :shocked:

Yes, not an infraction, I think they're different but I don't really know / care :joker:. Guess one of the mods must be a covert Tory. "Toy Soldier's stupid posts are a threat to you, your family, national security, The Queen, and you won't be able to get Doctor Who or Eastenders."

:joker:


I think all politicians should be ridiculed equally :laugh:

Closed - Serious debates is serious Debates not a place for threads about politicians who may or may not be robot ham joints :nono:

PS. A warning is just that, asking you not to do something, there are no points with it and it doesn't lead to a ban

PPS. Don't discuss your infractions/warnings on the main board