Radio Times and The Apprentice - Reasons?
 

So on the cover of my RT this week is Sugar, Brady and Littner

I cant find it online maybe someone can


Each person has had their face photoshopped within an inch of their lives, no lines under the eyes etc and it makes them look odd

Why do magazines do this?


is it to make them look good so that more celebs work with the RT, or is it because the photo editor is a lickspittle, or is it RT thinking that it will sell more copies?

here is a typical example

http://www.newsstand.co.uk/i2466759/...N_08082015.jpg


I see this as just as bad as fixing competitions, how do they get away with it?

I can only speak for myself LT, but I have it written into my contract, that if Vogue, Harpers, and other mags want to feature me on the front cover, then they HAVE to touch me up, and in addition they also have to make me look younger and better in my photos. :hehe:

Karren is a natural beauty

Does the Radio times still make paper copies? I thought it was all digital

No LT Total TV mag
does the whole day on one page


Life Is To Short

I agree, but Jerry Hall was uglier than that when she was on Ferry's 'Siren' album 40 years ago.

Arista, if Confucius were alive today, he'd be you.

:joker::joker::joker:

"before embarking on a journey to kill LT. Dig a bigger grave"

:laugh::laugh::laugh:

im watching narcos eps 3 and 4 ce soir

Yes and they sell like hotcakes with the old folk

I always buy the Christmas one and I'm not old :fist:

I don't know about you but Lord Sugar's looking better than ever on that cover

As long as it's a one off you're alright

You Devil



Total TV Mag
is faster than your thumbs on your
on your TV Guide on Screen
for something you do not know the ch., of


Life In The City

i only buy it for the articles

:idc:

MTVN can not fit them in

:smug: