Forget Trump - Look Who We Have No Objections To Letting In.
 

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/625...sts-we-let-in?


"THE petition to ban Donald Trump from Britain comes despite violent Islamic extremists being allowed to peddle their hate-filled mantras here for many years".

Dirty racist, nasty xenophobic, 'orrible nasty Trump wants to 'temporarily ban Muslims etc etc but is he advocating killing British people? Or any people for that matter? Is he advocating throwing gay people from the top of tall buildings? Is he advocating raping young girls then selling them off as sex slaves? Is he advocating conquering every country of the world by force to make it one great Caliphate, killing hundreds of millions of the legitimate indigenous citizens of those countries in order to do so and enslaving the rest?

No petition for these murderous scumbags. No protests either.

But then ORDINARY moderate BRITS are passive and don't broker such things as protests and petitions, that 's more the area of expertise of sinister Anti-British, anti-Western, pro-Islamic Terrorist opportunity seizing factions.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/625...affic.outbrain

I can't get over how we don't search people coming into the country more anyway (Muslim or non Muslim) it just leaves us as an easy target to attack it's dumb.

Yerr! If theys cudnt bring in teh parts for teh bombs then they cudnt make any bombs and cud go stret to jale from the plane station!!!1!

Kirk: as always, pointing out that something is "worse" than something else does not necessarily mean that that thing is "good". It's poor logic. Like trying to claim that crap tastes delicious because a spoonful of raw sewage would be worse.

You fecophile.

:laugh: I will reply once I've looked up what 'Fecophile' means. :laugh:

Raw Sausage probably tastes better than Poop, although I don't want to try either.

I certainly wouldn't want to sit next to Donald at a Business meeting and not because of his Politics, but because his got the nickname Donald Trump, who wants to sit next someone who trumps a lot?

Someone who has an obsession with the word feck?

:laugh:

Hmm, the point of the article seems to be that there's a hypocrisy amongst the signatories of the Trump petition. But I imagine that most of them would agree that these people should also have been banned (it looks like most of them have been now). But I think the reason Trump's petition has so many signatories is just because he has a much higher profile, whereas the men in this article will have gone relatively unnoticed by the general population because they didn't have as much press attention. I don't think it's necessarily a case of hypocrisy, unless the signatories are outwardly saying that Trump should be banned and these men shouldn't.

They were identified and banned, some were prior to the hate laws too. We know that Trump has extremist views, he doesn't advocate death yet he is prejudiced against Muslims...All Muslims, it it this that is objectionable.

'Holocaust deniers from across the globe descended on the UK to promote anti-semitism at a secret rally.

The group of right-wing extremists, Nazi sympathisers and their supporters allegedly heard speakers unleash vile rants in which Jews were described as the “enemy” and “children of darkness”.

The Campaign Against Anti-Semitism said in April: “Celebration of Nazism in 2015 is an affront to Britain and its proud history of standing against Nazism. These speakers from abroad should have been barred from entering the UK in the first place, just as other hate preachers have been.'

If we are aware of the intentions of individuals or groups then there should be a ban if there is sufficient evidence and support for action prior to entering the UK.

Yeah, I won't be having a fry up at your house. :)

The hypocrisy is ASTOUNDING!

:joker:

Donald Trump is well-known, you don't expect people to be able to list every single extremist and petition against them too? Surely the government is already banning them from the UK so why would anyone even need to submit a petition?

But you must remember that terrorist hate speakers are usually always muslim.Now we can't be banning muslims from our country because it would be racist or islamaphobist or some 'ist' that i have'nt heard about yet.We mus'nt upset any of the muslim population no matter what they preach or believe.Our hands are tied.

umm, no they aren't, what are you talking about???

for some reason, I like trump, he speaks the truth, but is crucified for it, like he told the zionist lobby, I don't need your dirty money, america has not had a straight forward talking leader, in a long time, I think trump has some similarities to nixon, they threw dirt at him for the truth, with watergate, after what he said in private, after it was recorded,

i'd never vote for the guy, cause i don't vote republican, i'm all for Hillary, but honestly, if i have to choose between Trump who hates Muslims, or Muslims who want to KILL me, i'll take Trump any day. Wake me up when muslims stop throwing gay boys off of tall buildings and then we can talk.

:clap1::clap1::clap1::clap1:

Presidential Historian Doris Kearns Goodwin see problems for Trump in the future if he cant deliver on all he has promised.

But the agreed that with 50 days to Iowa and 10 after that to New Hampshire the guy in the lead right now tends to go on and win

she cant see a credible person put up to beat him:shocked:

30% of Republicans support bombing Agrabah!
http://i100.independent.co.uk/articl..._campaign=i100

Whilst that question in the poll was fictional, others were not and...

46 per cent supported a national Muslim database
26 per cent believed Islam should be illegal
28 per cent favoured the policy of internment camps

Need I say more?

Lets bomb Atlantis next :joker:

You really couldn't make it up, crazy country

Rubio could get the Hispanic vote

But Trump is self funded
so its more fun.

Trump on the Mexico Wall
with its big Fat Door.