Apologists for Jade [a lifelong serial bully]
 

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2002310473,00.html

Give it up, she is a lowlife who has always bullied.

A leopard doesn't change its spots no matter how much money you throw at it

Admin: fixed link

Do you have an opinion of your own or do you let the Sun think for you?

"Give it up, she is a lowlife who has always bullied.

A leopard doesn't change its spots no matter how much money you throw at it "

that sounds like an opinion to me......

Do you usually have someone read posts for you who can comprehend what has been written ?

Not a very good comeback.

Anyway considering the Sun has helped Jade for years amass her fortune, only now it decides to print stories that she was a bully. How convenient.

That story is from 2002 when Jade was in Big Brother 3.

I posted it here - http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru....php?tid=54188

Along with some bits and pieces about her time in that house.

I didn't mean to be abrupt. It's just I'm not happy with the way the Sun are conducting themselves in this and resurficing stories about Jade's bullying when they helped create the Jade brand in the first place. It smacks of hypocrisy. Its become open season for the tabloids to crucify the girl and kick her when she's down.

I don't even like Jade much, I never have, but there is a principle here. Her bullying is down a lot to her upbringing up by that wretched woman she calls Mother.

Its probably best I avoid all the tabloids for the next week or so.

Edit: spelling! :bored:

Jade is on Ch4
Now.

she has been a bully all of her life

the tabloids are bullys. but thats ok, at least there not racist.

I object to the assumption behind this thread title of this thread

Some of us can see the game the red tops play and how many people get drawn in.

Am I defending everything she does when I point out that people only started seeing things that may not be there, because they were told it was there.

If anyone has any interest in history we have seen this all before, at Salem and at the House UnAmerican Activities Committee during the days of Senater McCarthy.

I am being labled an apologist for pointing out what we had in essence was a personality clash between two individuals, what complicated this was the fact that the two parties came from different racial groups. Thus any argument takes on a "racial" tone which is not there. Even people in the house and Shilpa, on reflection, felt that.

If anyone remembers back to a TV series called the X-Files, they sometimes had a slogan just adter the opening credits. Usually it was "The Truth is Out there" but sometimes they had "Believe the Lie" Are we to be labeled as apologists for not behaving like sheep?

Considering your original comment :clearly you have trouble comprehending what was written

I have an opinion of my own...... here it is:

- Jade is a bully
- Jade has played various members of the public conning them out of money on a bogus video and an AUTO biography she didnt write
- I saw her bullying and racism BEFORE the sun, they just confirm what i have to say!

Do you have proof Jade has been a bully ALL her life? Let's see it then.

I agree with what you say, mostly.

What you have to realise is that when you put people from different cultures, backgrounds and class in an enclosed environment you are bound to get friction, especially if certain individuals are opinionated and loud as Jade is.

It was no different to Derek Laud - who incidently has said he doesn't think Jade's comments have been racist and he is black - when he became a bit of an outcast in BB5. This wasn't because of his colour but because he was upperclass and was considerably older than the other housemates.

Im with different classes, cultures and people everyday. But i ALWAYS remember that was are all human

Ignorances and prejudices are no excuse