Sudanese migrant who walked through Channel Tunnel to Britain. Gets Asylum
 

[Chunnel stroll to asylum in
Britain: MPs say giving Sudanese
migrant refugee status is sending
out the wrong message to others
MPs have condemned decision
to grant asylum
to Abdul Rahman Haroun
Sudanese migrant charged after
being found in 31-mile tunnel in August
But Haroun, 40, has now won asylum
and will be allowed to say in Britain
Will now be given state-funded
accommodation and £37 weekly allowance]


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz3wO4RyYba


A Great Advert
Walk the tunnel get a home and cash

Its no wonder British Homeless
are stuck

Disgusting.Should've been shipped straight back to Sudan on the first avaliable boat.

Why can't we know the actual PEOPLE behind these ludicrous decisions? We have a right to know their names and the positions which they hold.

There is not one single legitimate reason for anyone who is a position of such authority and power, to have arrived at this insane decision.

This arrogant chancer CHOSE to break our laws to gain unlawful entry to the UK, and allowing him entry, benefits, and free dental and healthcare services not only makes a nonsense of the law, but also is a contemptuous kick in the teeth for all those indegenous citizens who are struggling to exist in this country on even the most basic of incomes.

It is also a mighty slap in the face for other 'asylum' seekers who attempted to gain LAWFUL entry to the UK by submitting the correct applications only to be denied.

You all should not have bothered. You would have been better off trying to enter ILLEGALLY. Still - at least you know better now the next time you try.

As for the fith columnist jerk-offs who are drawing fat salaries from the public purse for SUPPOSEDLY acting in OUR interests - let them be identified.

He was assessed... what more is there to say? Not known for our compassion are we of late so there has to be a viable reason.

Bang on right Kirk.
It sends out totally the wrong message.Illegal entry pays.

Another oversimplification of a statement.

How can you so glibly state that "there HAS to be a VIABLE reason" when he was granted permission to stay AND granted all the many benefits he has been, DESPITE the fact that he is an ILLEGAL immigrant who entered UNLAWFULLY?

This decision flies in the face of thousands of years of Law and Democracy, and until we KNOW just WHO is responsible for such a ludicrous and unjust decision, no one can state that "there has to be a viable reason".

There are countless examples of the most inane decisions by 'faceless, nameless', bureaucrats which later transpired to have been criminal decisions - including the payments of hundreds of thousands of pounds per annum in 'Housing Benefits' by one housing benefits department to an Asian immigrant Landlord, which it transpired was fraudulent, and the bureacrat responsible for sanctioning those payments was another immigrant and a friend of his.

Step out of that bubble and remove those spectacles because only the left lens is functioning.

Euro Feck Up



He could have done all that
In FECKKING France

Big mistake.
He has left a safe country, perhaps not the country of his choice, but safe all the same.
Sending him straight back would be a message to others that try the same method of entering this country.
More should be done to make sure genuine refugees seek their refuge in the first safe country they arrive at, then they can apply to move to another country of their choice, and that country can decide if they want them or not.

Who is the left lens functioning for? I didn't make the decision.

Now there will be no stopping them. It sends out the cpompletely wrong message to all the others. I take it that the idiot who allowed this man asyæum is putting him up in his/her house? Thought not.

Disgusting would be sending them back to Sudan where he would be surrounded by war and conflict. The poor man clearly wanted safety and who are we to say he cannot have that?

I am sure not all of Sudan is like that, its rather big and there are lots of people there. If that is not an option the the next country adjacent.

we are the UK with supposed border controls. Anyone that falsifies immigration information is given an immediate and automatic expulsion order and sent back with no possibility of returning for several years, so someone entering the country illegally should be subject to the same. No question about it.

Yes Crazy Signal

Get Home and Cash

FREE

I know exactly what you mean Josh. My mate once went on an extended holiday (his first holiday for 22 years being self-employed) and when he returned he discovered 11 heroin addict squatters living in his 4 bedroomed detached.

He was furious at first, but once they explained to him that all they wanted was safety and somewhere nice to live and that forcing them out would mean them having to return to the seedy and dangerous world of their filthy tenements in the inner city, he relented and let them stay.

Er.....No.... Not really.

Yes he should have Stayed in France Though

There are Americans who takes years to get a work visa in th UK, but you let syrians and other people with no paperwork in, it's offensive to me as an American.

Our countries have been allies for how long, but you make us wait years sometimes to work, but you let these people in right away.

IT'S NOT FAIR

100% true. Well said! :clap1::clap1::clap1:

I agree!

Aren't asylum and a work visa very different?

Deport them asap.

Fecking €uro Bastards


We must Build Higher Fences

Electric ones. The ones that don't just stun. We need those that once you touch it all thats left are your shoes with steam coming out of them.

Yes Electric With Warnings in Big Signs in Every Lingo




You want to climb this?


Go Ahead Punk

No, no warning signs cos that would only spoil the surprise.