Is winstons problem with homosexuals or homosexuality?
 

I believe that he doesn,t have a problem with homosexuals but actually because of his church upbringing is more likely to have a problem with the acts surrounding homosexuality.

Now if that is the case can i just say that it isnt any difference to the outrage shown on here by a majority of the forum towards the way he supposedly acted with tiffany. You are showing intolerence towards a man trying it on with a woman because of his age.

You could say she didnt want his rather clumsy attention but in turn is that any worse than jons remarks towards darren?

Dont get me wrong like i think the vast majority of viewers have towards winston, cause like winston i can easily be around homosexuals, but im not going to go out and pay to see it.

I understand Winstons comments now about not sharing a bed with a man or being afraid of the gay men in the house as he's clearly judging everyone by his own standards...........a dirty letch who can't control himself. Also, I don't see how Johns innuendos are similar to Winstons actions

I think he neither likes, trusts or understands homosexuality and is using his "christianity" as an excuse for his prejudice

I guess im saying they were both joking advances in the full knowledge that they wouldnt get anywhere..but thats not really the discussion point.

So its the sexual side off it all rather than the people?

IMO its his personal choice,and he's allowed that

Why did you bring it up then and put a question mark after it if you didn't want people to discuss it? :shrug:

Look Winston is homophobic. His problem. It obviously cuts right into him, for whatever reason.

That said, I believe in free speech. And having said that, if he did cross the line he'd be out of CBB.

But if his problem was with homosexuals would he have then gone on to basically plead to be allowed into the box with jon who is clearly homosexual.

Maybe he didn't know John was 'one'.

I think we're really on the same wave length this year Gusto :love:

Ha ha. That is sooooooooooo 'dangerous'.:joker:

No ,its his OPINION and he's entitled to it

:laugh:

And Gusto is entitled to consider it a problem since that's his opinion. It's a two way street.

He did research on all the hms like he has already said in the house..is it politically incorrect to describe someone as "one" these days? Cause if it is I'm fecked because i type like i talk and dont save the word "one" soleley for homosexuals. If we were describing idiots or anythying else i would be saying (insert name) are "one"

Everyone is entitled to an opinion, its what our existence is built on and principles come into it. There mere fact that the gays community and some straights are trying to gag him and brand him as a tyrant and homophobe, are the ones that need to look at themselves. Don't hang a label on anyone and expect him to not defend himself. He is straight and religious and does not want a willy up his bottom or contact with men, that's a humanly right situation and I share his views on sleeping with other men and I certainly don't want anything thicker than a pencil up my Jacksie, so am I homophobic as well, certainly not.

;) :wavey::smug:

I totally agree.:smug:

And people are allowed to judge him for it.

Agreed,but you will never change his opinion, no one could ever change mine

I'm not saying for him to change his mind, my main issue is that I think his saying this stuff for attention rather than actually feeling that way about gay people.

Yes he said Just that

on the Daily Politics BBC2HD
so he is like "some" Irish folk are right now

Bad grammar i guess


People can discuss what they like, i was just hoping the thread title would ne the main tallking point.

I agree.Specially with the ageism part.If Winston was a young good looking lad then nobody would bat an eyelid.

He strikes me as someone who is horrified by males having sex but would happily smash a girl, half his age, back doors in and think nothing of it