![]() |
Why does C5 not like having only two housemates up for eviction?
In the past few series of Big Brother on C5, there have been very few evictions with only two housemates facing the vote, and I'm not sure why they've avoided this in the past few years. Does anybody know why C5 decide to do this, because sometimes people go who wouldn't necessarily be nominated and it's unfair.
|
More money made if there's more people up.
|
Because more people up = more money
|
It's kinda ****ty. I just want them to have a set rule, I don't care what the rule actually is
|
The fact that the only head-to-head they've had in god knows how many years resulted in Eileen going is rather sad
|
It's a joke. However, they would get hardly any votes for just Jeremy and Stephanie but now that Tiffany is up they will make much more. Money grabbers basically
|
they haven't done it since 2012 D:
|
(apart from Eileen's eviction but I'd rather not talk about that)
|
Quote:
|
Crappy vote to save is why. Vote to save is just vote to evict with 2 people and to think some people wanted vote to save. eww
|
Money
|
Quote:
|
I really think had another housemate been declared the purest other than Scotty that it would have been only 2 up.
He was the only one to give Tiffany a vote. I understand that he would not nominate his friend however. I don't think it is about money really either, I used to think that in other series but now it is only around 24 hours the lines are open, rarely are the lines open for days like they used to be to maximise voting. |
It's very annoying that there's no set rule anymore. It's ridiculous that someone can receive one nomination and be up when there's numerous housemates who've received 4.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.