Should Steph have been allowed to nominate?
 

All in the title really - should Steph have been allowed to nominate as normal after being given a killer nomination the night before?

Personally, I think that she shouldn't have as the killer nomination already gave her an extra advantage over the rest of the housemates - letting her nominate normally on top of that was just unfair on the other housemates.

i can't remember if it mattered in the end.

Yes it was a treat so she shouldn't have lost her normal nominations for it

They broke the rules.. They all shouldve been up except Steph for breaking the rules

She nominated John and Darren so it didn't

No point really as the BB have already lost their integrity by compromising the nominations last week when they gave Gemma a pass by not being allowing to play the toxic game, then giving her the reward for being non toxic.

At this point, it doesn't really matter.

Yes.
I'd have only said no had Daniella not been able to nominate because of Stephanie's killer nom to her.

The others talked about noms and Steph was given her killer nom because of that.
Steph also broke the nomination rules so she should have lost the right to nominate. Instead the whole house was punished with no hot water - and on Gemma's birthday too. :nono:

OMG...poor Gemma....the things she's had to endure. Oh the horror!!!!!!

There shouldn´t have been a killer nom in the first place, just all of them up with 1 or 2 going on Tuesday.

ooo, the votes so close, it's exciting.