Panama papers?...
 

What are they? What's going on?... :/

http://www.theguardian.com/news/live...b0fde262ff63fc

You need to listen to the BBC news Kizzy, details of tax haven accounts leaked WH did a poem on it this am :joker:

I'll stick to the Guardian thanks ;)
Still fair play to the BBC here.

We'll be up to our scrawny necks in it too no doubt.

Its more a case of who hasn't been doing dodgy deals there .... really funny now they are all found out

The information contained in the documents is huge. This is a story that will continue to run and reveal for years.

Dear David - wow talk about 'on top' and about bout time ! Of course ' we're all in it together ' Yeah ok

But watch how they turn our attention away from what's happening on our own front doorstep. I mean, lets all talk about Iceland and Putin!.

Poor Dave; I bet he was totally unaware of his father’s own attempts to hide the ownership of Blairmore Holdings, Inc. in order to avoid paying taxes in the UK :hehe:
http://www.thecanary.co/2016/04/04/g...onaire-father/

This was discussed at length this afternoon on BBC 5 live so no hiding the issue

Looks like everyone's okay with these documents being "leaked". I mean, it fits in with a lot of people's agendas, doesn't it. David Cameron's Dad... how fortunate.

Anyone interested in who it was who leaked these documents? I mean, there is a whole other thread about Apple refusing to allow the Security Services to access a terrorist's phone because it'll apparently threaten "personal privacy"... but there's an awful lot of support... and a certain amount of glee... that some nameless, faceless organisation has unlawfully accessed what are essentially private files because it shames people you don't like.

You can't have it both ways... no access for the security services but full acceptance of some spotty hacker because he reinforces your own agenda.

Personally, i always protect peoples right to privacy. However, if someone breaches that and the information enters the public domain, then there is no going back, and if wrong doing has been committed, then it should be acted upon.

If it was a whistleblower/hacker, if they broke the law publishing it, they should be prosecuted. Simple really.

Whilst Cameron is not accountable for his fathers actions, he does have a duty to answer questions about whether or not he still has links to this offshore company. He can't claim its a private matter when tax evasion is of public interest and very much a public concern.

Lets also not forget that Cameron has a very privileged background which was financed by his fathers offshore dealings. If my parents stole the crown jewels and left them to me in their will, I wouldn't be allowed to keep or benefit from those jewels because they never really belonged to my parents, they belonged to the country.

Ian Cameron's offshore dealings were public knowledge years ago.
Plenty of people put their money offshore, the same as Swiss bank accounts. If it is not illegal then what is all the fuss about.....Ohhh yeah, someone with money and privilege might be getting one over on the taxman, these same people that probably already pay more taxes than us plebs earn.
Good for them. Seems it is a sin to be well off in this country. :idc:

When a crime is being committed, as we see here; then we often rely on whistle-blowers. Lets take a nursing home scenario where elderly folks with dementia are being abused. Its usually just one person who sees the going on as morally wrong and decides to pull the plug on this criminal activity.

I work in an environment where we are expected to whistle-blow if we see anything we deem to be suspicious.

The person who has pulled the plug on this massive tax evasion has not done so for financial gain or for notoriety, though he/she did ask for protection. They did not personally meet journalists in the flesh or talk to them on the phone. Everything was handed of in encrypted files. If the government had been able to unlock encryption, these files very probably couldn't of been handed over because they would of been immediately blocked and traced back to the sender.

Oh and before anyone says, tax evasion is not a crime...in my eyes its very much a crime. Its ****ing appalling that people are allowed to get away with this sort of theft.

You cannot prosecute the son for the sins of the father and David Cameron has no duty whatsoever to speak for his father's actions, whether he's Prime Minister or not. Seems to me that Cameron's biggest crime is to be considered "privileged".

Of course tax evasion is a crime. I can't imagine anyone saying it isn't.

So... this kind of action is okay in your books, respectable even. But terrorists can continue to use their cellphones with impunity knowing that the security services can't touch them. And let's face it, you're making up your own story here about the noble hacker doing it for the greater good and what the government can and can't access when you know no more about this story or who is responsible than any of us.

One rule of unlawful whistle-blowers, another for the security services.

Smudgie smacking the nail on the head, there...

It is the confusion between evasion and avoidance that is the beggar here.
Avoidance may appear unfair to most, but until they change or tighten up the rules then it is quite within the law to stash your stash.
Well worth a visit to a decent financial advisor if you come into a little windfall.

You're right Smudgie... making a habit of it, aren't you?!

If you have a good accountant he can save you a bomb, like you say. And I don't know anyone who says no... I won't claim that as a business expense because I want to pay as much tax as I can. Quite the reverse.

On The PM
his dads account is legal.

New Labour had 13 fecking years
left it all.

Now Blair is Rich

Don't put words in my mouth Livia, nobody said prosecute Cameron; I said Cameron needs to answer questions regarding his current interests in his inheritance.

The deliberately muddled terms between “tax evasion” and "tax avoidance" tend to get used interchangeably, even by conservative MP's.

Absolutely. The whistle-blower in this case has done the British nation a huge service. They have very decently just confirmed what we already suspected but it needed a vigil anti with more guts than a xmas turkey to reveal the corruption going on by billionaires around the globe. Now Cameron has to be seen to be doing something because the majority of the nation won't allow this one to be swept under the carpet.

The British bourgeoisie and aristocracy have been benefiting from these arrangements for a very long time. Half this country is now owned by offshore investors and so no, I don't accept that the few crumbs the government throws at the British electorate is enough to pacify me. Why should the minions who humbly pay their taxes have to subsidise these massive tax avoiders.

So... NO, I don't trust this corrupt government to gain access to our privacy and I don't believe for a second that they want access to encryption because of terrorism.

"I said Cameron needs to answer questions regarding his current interests in his inheritance. "

DR he did today Live on SkyNewsHD & BBCNewsHD (Northern Live Event)
all legal.
His Dead Dad
seems to be more a Problem with Fecking Labour
wasting time over this.

why do you always use Labour as the straw man?

Today Corbyn rushed onto TV News
I want him to say how he can make the UK better
Not Waste My fecking time
on the PM's dead dad
who broke no laws

If the LibDems did that
I would attack them