-
 

-

I doubt he would have been cast without Charlie

No chance.

It's not all about Eastenders type of storylines to be interesting on BB for me.

But Jason does lack anything that makes me find a Housemate interesting imo.

This is my boxes that he needs to tick.

Entertaining? x
Fun? x
Likable? x
Doesn't play the victim? x
Not in a Showmance? x
Not scripting OTT boring storylines? x
Argumentative? x
Bitchy? x
Embrace that his a gameplayer to the public? x

Not a chance. Without Charlie he has nothing and he will fall into obscurity and end up in the final cause everyone forgets he even exits. And as Pete said, Charlie is the sole reason he has even been picked to be in the show.

Charlie is making him relevant in the show. After she is gone, he becomes useless and irrelevant.

No. But he would have enjoyed his experience a lot more

Well the same could be said about any of them would some of them have a storyline if not for Andy,would Ryan have a storyline if not for Hughy or Sam,would jayne have a storyline without Chelsea ? Will Jackson have a storyline now Georgina has left and laura doesn't seem to have much going for her now marco has left,we all need someone to bounce off ,Jason has enjoyed himself a few times but Charlie makes sure that doesn't happen too often.

and vice versa.

That can't be true, jason told Charlie he had never discussed her in the house.:joker:

Exactly....I would question how long Georgina would have lasted without Marco and Jackson...cause the two weeks she had neither she all but disappeared.

Well said.

the first week was all about the nightmare that was marco

then most the airtime concentrated on the other house v the main house - natalie, then jayne v chelsea

then it was mostly about georgina and jackson, moving into jason and charlie territory. jason's walking on permanent eggshells trying to keep a fragle sense of normality.

when the loudmouth, deluded, and desperate are out that's when the decent people will have a chance to enjoy themselves and be seen doing so. personally, that's what i find most entertaining - the stuff that makes me smile and laugh along with the housemates, not at them.

To describe him as wooden is kind in my view, I find the whole thing tedious in the extreme and I still don't buy into it all

Jason did have a storyline before Charlie...there was the unlikely friendship of the hard looking straight guy and the intellectual gay guy....it was really quite some thing to see and was a million times more genuine than a lot of the false sentiment being shared amongst some of the others.
Just his support of Andy the other day and his selfless decision to not see his dog today alone would have won him more fans than anything Alex, Sam or Evelyn have done so far.

Good post :clap1:

No he didn't !! the cameras were firmly fixed on marco and laura,NONE of the others got much of a look in,and we see 45 mins a night so I really doubt we have heard all his conversations,but I guess that's all you've got ,as he is a nice ,gentle guy,I know it's not 'cool' to be nice in BB,but I kinda like it.

Probably not..... but vice versa, Charlie would not have a story without him....

You can't know that,you are not in there 24/7, he was also quite close to Georgina until Jackson got with her,so I disagree with you.:wavey:

No he doesnt, he gets on well with Evelyn and he chats to Jackson & Alex.

His friendship with Andy would have been a storyline maybe.
But yeah I agree he wouldn't be casted if it wasn't for Charlie and vice versa.

Absolutely not