Animal cruelty
 

Wrong of BB to so that to Clio as she does not understand and did not consent to play that game. Shame on them.

bastards:nono:

There is no way I could not have turned for any dog I had,they would sense I was there and ignoring them would leave them thinking they had done wrong.

I agree, I think it was wrong to do that.

I didn't see it but I agree it must have been very distressing for the dog

the dog is 12 years old and could of course smell Jason and looked distressed and was whining.

Horrible to watch

It was unfair on Chloe.... I bet Jason wishes he had pressed the button now after the selfish 3 yesterday...
I reckon he will win a task and get time with her...

I would definitely have turned for my little yorkie so I totally RESPECT AND ADMIRE Jason for not doing so

I would respect him more if he choose comforting his pet over a stupid task

.

I agree, I know if i had turned round for my pooch i doubt i would have let go and the poor thing would be so upset been taken from me.

That could have made it worse,the dog would have to be taken away from him again:shrug:

I didn't watch it but could the dog see him? if so then I disagree with you, being ignored is worse for a dog imo

no but obviously it could smell him so know exactly where he was - hence why it was distressed

Then he should have went to it imo

Would they be aloud Cleo in the house full stop? I know they had a dog in BB2 and I believe they've had Big Brother pets in otber versions around the world so yeah what would people think of the dog basically being a housemate but has a housemate bring her to the diary room for producers to walk her a couple times a day.

Would this work?

That is a great idea,but they would have to watch Charlie didn't get too jealous of it:laugh: I'de love to see Clio in the house

jason.....'it's just a dog...she will be ok'

Mark L

It was more distressed because it could smell Charlie, poor thing thought it was going to get kicked again

That's what the man said in the DR he didn't seem arsed

Not likely because the dog would need constant supervision. There are too many people who don't own dogs or have never handled them that will try to feed them human foods as treats and there are a lot of seemingly harmless things that are very toxic to animals.

The HM's can't be bothered to clean up after themselves much less for a dog. They wouldn't be careful enough about leaving food or other hazards lying around that the dog could pick up and eat.

Many dogs don't react well to strange environments, situations. They rely on the leader of the path aka a human alpha for their sense of comfort and security. The dog may be very well mannered before entering the house, but a lot of dogs may start pooping/peeing/marking on the carpet from the stress alone. Some can become more aggressive in that situation. All it would take is for HM's to have a loud row for the dog to become anxious and maybe bite someone. To (mostly) stabilize the dog, the owner would have to be there and likely they would have to receive special treatment.

That's just some of the issues I can see with it but there would be a lot of variables they would have to control and probably have an on-site vet 24/7. Not to mention all the animal right's groups that will no doubt have a bone to pick (pun intended) about every task production decides to use the dog in

Talk about kicking a dog when it's d- never mind...

It won't have remembered the second it got out of the house surely? It's not like a child.

Erm, well they are conscious??

I totally agree with you. That poor little dog:dog::dog: