Was annihilate supposed to be Unanimous or Majority
 

I was under the impression that the HMs had to annihilate a fellow HM based on an unanimous decision rather than the majority. Whilst I am pleased that Chelsea has gone it would have made it better for an unanimous vote, something like a judge might ask for in a court, and then it would had some fight to save Chelsea, but in the end leading to more discontent amongst the HMs.

I think BB said unanimous but frankly that's very unlikely. Majority rules should be accepted imo

It was an unanimous decision as no one argued against it

From what I understood it was suppose to be UNANIMOUS. But the HM's are too thick and BB clearly doesn't care enough to enforce their instructions by whatever means.

Def should be more than what happened...,too many lick arses being manipulated by Lateysha. If BB allow her to set the tone of the remaining weeks the show will become as trashy as she is.

They all agreed with the decision..Andy lamented in the diary room that he should have argued for Chelsea

It ended up being unanimous, as they all said they would unanimously agree with the vote.

It's very difficult to get a unanimous decision when each housemate has friends.

It's a stupid way to do it.

Never saw the UK Unanimous unfortunately. I managed to see the first episode of the US version, but the rest wasn't available anywhere except on Amazon, and they wouldn't let me get the show as I don't live in the US. The first episode was interesting so that was and still is frustrating.

Lateysha was the last to vote so how can you blame her? grasp them straws a tad harder?

I agree, it is really bad.

Technically, it was unanimous, as nobody (but Chelsea) disagreed with the final result

I suppose it's just up them to decide how they reach that result

I think as far as what their decision was, they unanimously agreed to go with the majority decision. That's fine, except as it was done publicly one by one it failed to be neutral. Just like say Vanessa in BB6.

bunch of cowardly sheep

They unanimously decided to accept the majority

This - they all agreed with it

If it had to be unanimous, can you imagine that lot sitting there all night, without a fag, trying to defend someone who could take the prize money from under their nose in the end.
Such loyalty alas does not exist in the BB house.
I think it was meant to be unanimous, but even BB realised how hopeless that was going to be.

Exactly what I came on to post ....the vote WASNT unanimous

so true..

The way they are doing it is unfair and IA with Chelsea. Why dont they make them pre-pick their vote before revealing? People are playing it safe by just going with the name thrown out there. Like Hughie wanted to say Andy but there was no point when the majority had already gone with Chelsea