![]() |
Why do the producers continue to change the nom rules?
How are the viewers supposed to keep up with this crap? They decide what the rules are after noms come in so they can make sure certain people are more likely to go than others.
And no one complains anymore! Why don't fan sites like this and BB Spy make a bit more of a stink about it? |
They know Grant will go on a head to head and it's no loss to them
|
Tbf the viewers don't have to keep up with anything, they just vote when they're given the numbers.
Anyway nobody but Grant would have gone if he was up so meh |
Quote:
|
Casuals are too dumb to pick up on this ... I just want consistency tbh
|
Only two up really....
|
I swear that producers change every year because they are all sacked so inconsistency is expected
|
It suits their agenda
|
Quote:
Also it's just a more boring eviction vote anyway. |
Seems to me that the producers are doing their darndest to ruin what had the makings of a good CBB . Not happy at all.
|
So dum
|
Quote:
|
People just need to be GRATEFUL that we've got a head to head, I don't care about any rules about how many are up, cos if it was 2 up like people want, there'd be too many up. Does it actually matter anyway cos in any situation Grant is getting the least anount of votes. But there was such a difference between James and Grant who had 8/10 and Bear who had 3
|
Quote:
It is so stupid. You give them carte blanche to do anything they want, including things like giving Helen immunity for an entire series. |
It's a head to head (which is great btw) because James & Grant got so much votes compared to Bear and with it being VTS Bear would have been safe anyway so I doubt it's cuz they were trying to save him.
And yes in BB14 there was Dexter & Gina with Jemima at just 3 but that was 3 years ago and they wanted to try mid week savings remember?? That's why more than 2 noms were introduced in the first place you know! And also who would have wanted a week 2 vote which would have gotten rid of Dexter or Gina anyway? |
Quote:
It's got nothing to do with how many votes Grant and James got. It's do with them being ready to lose certain housemates but not others. Stop making excuses for what is a blatant attempt to get certain people out over others. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
No one is saying they did it to save Bear. But they did do it to make sure it was most likely to be Grant or James. |
I like head to head evictions they're better hopefully they keep this all series long and into civilian next year.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
I agree with you, Yaki da, anyone with 2+ votes should be up.
The only thing we can do to protest is by NOT voting to save either Grant or James. If enough people were to do that, C5 might change its mind and play fair. |
Quote:
But as long as people either ignore it, or worse than that, actually support the production team doing it, then the show will just become an even bigger mess. It's a shame that a show that had such a clear format back when it was watched by 4 - 5 million has now ended up in such a state and that there are people on forums like these cheering it on. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:08 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.