Quote:
Originally Posted by rusticgal
(Post 8948384)
...to see that a majority of this forum stood up for human decency and switched off rather than see 'low life ' walk away as winner of CBB.
|
I don't know that it's just that... The show runs counter to morals very often. If people wanted to make a statement about
moral injustice then they would've collectively quit the job the first few weeks with the addition of the playboy experience (and some indeed did). Sticking through to the final to see if the morally bankrupt HM would lost not only lines C5's pockets but validates their purpose. That was the storyline we would be fed and now C5 has to "endure" (aka benefit) from the fallout of "fix" accusations... producers probably literally sit at their screens and shrug.
BB went up against their own rules and overly favored one housemate with their edits and compromised the quality of the experience... short of handing him the win personally, they've done everything to make sure he was at least in the final.
His win isn't even the issue. The public can vote for whoever they
choose and if it were a fair process, more power to them. Except that this wasn't a standard BB. This series was more about talent search than about being a social competition.
It ceased to be a game when they gave him unlimited mulligans/"second" chances" with his window breaking and other shenanigans (some that never aired). It wasn't fair when they undermined the game by allowing that same HM to rule the house without rules and boundaries. Even further, when they skewed the edit by leaving out
very pertinent information from the highlights, they gave the other HM's several considerable handicaps in order to keep the one they wanted to keep in the game...the other HM's didn't have their chance, much less many mulligans, to really shine which destroyed the point of the game and thus, the
experience. Can you imagine watching a sports game where all the other plays are held down with 100lb weights while one of the weakest players is given a jetpack to cross the field. This BB was social experimentation on performance enhancing drugs. It was an experience alright, just not a very
fun one.
However, like real life where the players that are breaking records are given huge deals and sponsorships to continue breaking records (until they are found out and those sponsorships are "ripped away"...). BB producted prevented similar by leaving out his several warnings.
If people think this game is fair and want to blame the jury, then fine. Bear is BB's
OJ Simpson who got off scot-free. Let's be real, he should've have been ejected weeks ago.
It is just a game, but the problem is it's far from being a
fair one and that just about ruins the experience for me.
Sign of the times.