Worst winner ever
 

At least Bear contributed to his series

Her best bits
http://pbs.twimg.com/media/C3xi9TqWEAEWOlU.jpg

And people still think the public vote shouldn't be scrapped :rolleyes:

lol no CBB has had MUCH worse winners than this

:joker::joker::joker:

>>>>> Bear, Scotty and James sry

(and Charlotte, Jim and Bez)

Welp how tragic she's done nout!

Fantastic result

You're just saying this as you're bitter your Fave didn't win
There's been much much worse winners in the past

You're just saying this as you're bitter your Fave didn't win
There's been much much worse winners in the past

one of them

She has done nothing at all.

Eh after people like Helen, Bear, Jim Davidson etc. won I'm not that mad

Not even close... she's top tier (don't come for me)

Bear won so no.

Above Helen and Bear at the very least

That is spot on Kazanne.

I haven't watched this series so I can't really say either way.

What I will say however is that the public tend to like more negative thinking Housemates than positive thinking Housemates on Ch5 BB.

I can't believe that I'm saying this but BB needs to have a positive thinking winner instead of either nasty people winning, or Coleen's tactic of playing the victim (going by her first stint anyway) the only positive thinking winner that we've had on Ch5 was Julian Clary.

They all at least done something. I genuinely can't think of one Coleen moment in there..

erinp5 spot on

She's certainly not the best winner

Agreed this wound is bloody atm

I always prefer someone who did nothing than someone who effected their series negatively like Bear and Helen did :shrug:

The right one still wouldn't win.

But someone that does nothing offers no discussion, which then goes against the grain of the programme imo.

On any Reality Show/Talent Show I always want contestants to stick around that we're gonna discuss, not people that won't rock the boat on anything.