Shooting in Orlando (Florida)
 

Multiple fatalities. :(

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.bbc...s/amp/40162989

Not terror related apparently?

I read it was a disgruntled employee

Their gun laws are a much bigger issue than terrorism but no one seems to be shouting about that ever, very odd

Agree.. it's mental :crazy:

Oh no, Mr Trump himself has tweeted about gun laws in the wake of this weekend's attack:

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/...31574649901056

https://s11.postimg.org/tk3yqe1df/Capture.pngimage hosting 15mb

I share Ben David Grabinski's sentiments

What a ****ing moron

Hear hear.

There would have been alot more killed if they'd had guns rather than knives, does he not realise that?

I think this is one of the most sickening tweets I've ever seen from the *******wit. He doesn't have a clue.

You beat me to it. ****ing moron.

Well it's the type of stuff you'd expect to see someone like Katie Hopkins post not the the President of America

omg so sad :(

And we're still going to let this piece of **** into this country with open arms

Does he not realise how pathetic he sounds, if the terrorists in London had been allowed to openly obtain guns it'd have been much, much worse

Orlando has really been through the mill this past year :( the anniversary of the Pulse shooting is very soon.

I think the Whitehouse needs its internet access taking out while Trump's incharge for his own good :laugh:

Not until he's done the drunken dick pic...although Russia probably have that covered.

You could also say, there would have been a lot less deaths were people armed and able to stop them.

Ordinary folk, out enjoying themselves with guns in their pockets? Untrained, scared and maybe full of the drunk? I'm sorry it'd have been a lot worse!

I guess you could...but would you?

I do sometimes. Many seem completely blinkered when it comes to the right to bear arms though. The NRA have done a great brain washing job. Big bucks, no conscience, the NRA.

You'd have thought the first time someone gunned down children in a school it would have been enough to take a good look at the right to bear arms, but no apparently a lot more children have to die first.

:clap1:

I'm just giving you the case of what the people on the other side of the debate are saying.

I'd just go by the laws of the land I live in.

Fair enough.

And as such, I think a rapid armed police response was all that was needed.

What could possibly be done though?

It would be the biggest bloodbath since WW2 if the army went door to door trying to seize weapons.
The second amendment is to rise up against corrupt government.That would be a corrupt government in American law.
The US is stuck with guns.