ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   BB18 (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=708)
-   -   Could they bring back people who left during a VTS? (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=321483)

Cal. 23-06-2017 02:23 PM

Could they bring back people who left during a VTS?
 
What would be your stance on someone coming back who was evicted via VTS? Technically nobody voted them out of the house and the people they voted to keep in the house stayed in so it doesn't seem to be breaking any rules?

We want Imran and Sukhvinder back in!

Niamh. 23-06-2017 02:24 PM

Nah i wouldn't like the idea tbh, evicted should mean evicted

reece(: 23-06-2017 02:25 PM

Bring back the married legends

pontyboi 23-06-2017 02:27 PM

That's the good thing about vts is we can get some legends back without screwing over the public like BB7 did.

I don't think they should be eligible to win however as they've been on the outside.

Cal. 23-06-2017 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 9383885)
Nah i wouldn't like the idea tbh, evicted should mean evicted

I don't mean they'd be like 'Day 20: Randy Mandy walks back in as a fully fledged housemate!' but a possible vote or decision from the housemates on which evicted housemate got to go back in (pairing Imran and Sukhvinder up as one housemate this time of course).

Niamh. 23-06-2017 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cal. (Post 9383893)
I don't mean they'd be like 'Day 20: Randy Mandy walks back in as a fully fledged housemate!' but a possible vote or decision from the housemates on which evicted housemate got to go back in (pairing Imran and Sukhvinder up as one housemate this time of course).

hhhmmm, the only way it would acceptable ish imo is if the public got to vote on it

Cal. 23-06-2017 02:30 PM

They could even pull a Jon Tickle.

I just think Sukhvinder has left a huge void in the show and is needed!

pontyboi 23-06-2017 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Niamh. (Post 9383894)
hhhmmm, the only way it would acceptable ish imo is if the public got to vote on it

Great idea but the public tend to make terrible decisions sadly.

EspeonBB 23-06-2017 02:32 PM

Send Mutha Mandy back in to clock Tom

Cal. 23-06-2017 02:32 PM

Out of a vote of everyone gone so far (excluding Arthur and Kayleigh obviously) I think Imran and Sukhvinder would get voted in pretty easily.

reece(: 23-06-2017 02:33 PM

SUKH was the show!

Cal. 23-06-2017 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reece(: (Post 9383906)
SUKH was the show!

I miss her :(

It's like if Kosi had been evicted Week 2 in BB6</3

MB. 23-06-2017 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cal. (Post 9383893)
'Day 20: Randy Mandy walks back in as a fully fledged housemate!'

Here for it :clap1:

Cal. 23-06-2017 02:39 PM

http://www.nwemail.co.uk/portalsuite...rue__image.jpg

They're coming!

Withano 23-06-2017 02:40 PM

Nah, voting to save implies that someone would not be saved. From an ethical point of view I'm against it. Arthur and Sukh can come back though.

Epic. 23-06-2017 03:06 PM

I'd LOVE a Sukhi and Imran comeback

Epic. 23-06-2017 03:06 PM

ESPECIALLY with the house divide deepening. Just imagine the two of them taking down lotan

bots 23-06-2017 03:07 PM

what would be the point in them bringing back people who have already shown to be unpopular with the public and failed to bring them in much revenue

Cal. 23-06-2017 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 9383967)
what would be the point in them bringing back people who have already shown to be unpopular with the public and failed to bring them in much revenue

Sukhvinder would have done. They just need to bring Imran back as well to get her to go back in!

Vicky. 23-06-2017 03:32 PM

...no. That would be taking the piss. Sukh definitely shouldnt be back in, she shouldn't even be getting interviews and such tbh as she is a walker.

They cannot offer a public vote, then just ignore it and put them back in because a few viewers are upset that their faves went :S

Nicky91 23-06-2017 03:32 PM

it should be just VTE from now on, way easier to vote i think

Cal. 23-06-2017 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 9384045)
...no. That would be taking the piss. Sukh definitely shouldnt be back in, she shouldn't even be getting interviews and such tbh as she is a walker.

They cannot offer a public vote, then just ignore it and put them back in because a few viewers are upset that their faves went :S

Oh you vicious cow

http://i.imgur.com/NCWEPIN.gif

Vicky. 23-06-2017 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Withano (Post 9383921)
Nah, voting to save implies that someone would not be saved. From an ethical point of view I'm against it. Arthur and Sukh can come back though.

I would love Arthur back but...he walked. Still think theres something dodgy about his leaving though. I find it hard to believe he randomly decided to walk and find it suspicious that they didn't show ANY of it..simply said 'arthur has decided to leave the house'

Letting walkers back in would be a bit daft. I don;t even like it when they walk but don't really leave the house then are allowed back. Like Lisa (Marios lass) when she 'left' had tea and biscuits with producers then was put back :S

Vicky. 23-06-2017 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cal. (Post 9384051)

Oh wow. I actually missed the episode with the slipper thing...that looks pretty bad. I assumed it was a mistake :laugh:

Northern Monkey 23-06-2017 03:38 PM

So what was even the point in the public voting in the first place?Or infact the whole eviction?


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.