Jemma got more votes than Sandi ?????????????????
 

I know some think being as vile as Jemma is entertaining .I don't.I enjoy an argument to a certain extent but always find them irritating really and quite stressful but enjoy putting down nasties,but I'm like most good people

Id prefer not arguing and have argued for a long time that there are other ways to entertain apart from it being an absolute talent show of coarse.BB should put more work into and Channel 5 should be prepared to pay more to participants if necessary to get in more people in with genuine intelligence

and real talent,to stop the only thing we have left being nastiness being seen as the only way to entertain .

So I don't enjoy arguments or nastiness at all really and there bave been far too many winners already who ave gone too far in their nastiness which IMO Jemma has so if she wins although it s hard to stop watching something as addictive I will be boycotting the show and campaigning for lots of others to not watch it either .

I'm sure the producers are quaking in their boots at that. :joker::joker:

People say it all the time, how many said they'd never watch it after that B bollix? Same people, still watching.

Anyway, how has she gone too far?

I agree that Jemma has been vile, but Sandi was insignificant, a bigger crime on this show

Sarah, Chad, Helen and Sam also got more votes than Sandi. What's your point?

Some people purposely vote for the dickheads, because they are dickheads. Something about house dynamics, or confusing airtime with entertainment.

Yep she got more votes than Sandi that’s correct and she’s also gonna get more votes than anyone in the final when she wins :love:

I think Sandi was a bit of a dickhead actually, acting like Gordon Ramsay in the kitchen

That was her downfall, as she never actually did anything else

Many 'kitchen covetors' have gone the same way to their own surprise

Atleast Jemma actually contributed to the show