![]() |
Winner Preference: Nasty or Dull?
Right so would you rather have a winner that was genuinely nasty (eg Helen) who was a main character or someone nice but dull who hardly contributed to their series (think Sam)?
Poll incoming x |
I've never been more annoyed by a winner than i was Sam so I picked nasty
|
Helen is one of the best winners
|
Hells bells is the best HM ever
|
Hmmm idk cause I was more content with Helen winning than Sam
But I preferred Coleen, Scotty T, James etc winning rather than Bear |
I like it nasty
|
Dull because Helen and Bear are vile
|
It depends if I like the nasty person or not.
|
Absolutely dull x1000000000. Being dull > being a vile scumbag worth no positivity or oxygen
|
Ideally, neither.
But if you're asking if I prefer Sam as a winner instead of Helen as a winner, then yes I do. |
Even though I loathe Helen, I chose nasty as if they are not too vile, I think that would make me watch the series as we all do not want them to get the boot. If ypu are dull and have no personality, I thibk thry should be voted out early tbh...
|
Dull easily.
|
Likeable
|
Dull because they can still be somewhat likeable.
|
Nice guys should always win.
|
Dull because I'm not here for nasty people being rewarded for their behaviour
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Pro) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.