ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums

ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/index.php)
-   Serious Debates & News (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=61)
-   -   Is jeremy corbyn a hypocrite. (https://www.thisisbigbrother.com/forums/showthread.php?t=330514)

Beso 03-11-2017 03:11 PM

Is jeremy corbyn a hypocrite.
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-41783898



Yet he promotes a man he knew had done this.https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.t...-activist/amp/

DemolitionRed 03-11-2017 03:59 PM

I doubt Corbyn even knew about it. Its his PA's who we need to be looking at.

Withano 03-11-2017 04:23 PM

Didn't read the link but nah. Corbyn is only positive adjectives. Watch him tonight on celebrity gogglebox for stand up to cancer on channel 4 at 9pm if you don't believe me.

joeysteele 03-11-2017 04:31 PM

No,not at all.

Oliver_W 03-11-2017 04:43 PM

Corbyn is just rubbish, but I doubt he even knew about the whole Hopkins thing - until he suspended him.

joeysteele 03-11-2017 06:30 PM

The point is whether he knew or not so what
A complaint was made,no action deemed necessary at that time with just a reprimand.

A reprimand does not obstruct advancement,if new issues come to light,or it happens again fair enough.
The person complaining didn't say any more when he was put on the shadow cabinet.
Why did she not, would be a question I'd ask out of simple interest.

A lot of what we hear as to all allegations at present sound inappropriate ,no doubt about that.
However really serious or criminal seems a little way off on the surface,for me anyway.

Apart from the Labour activist rape claim that is.

A fair way to go as to how this unfurls but at the time,even after a reprimand only, Corbyn did nothing more,even if he knew, than give him one more chance.
I'm still a little mystified as to what it is from what we know so far that means Michael Fallon had to resign.
Unless he knows more and more serious is to come.

This is going to be a testing time for both Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn,in fact likely other party leaders too.
Depending on what is yet to come.

Giving people second chances is no crime especially when at the time of doing so,no one has been deemed to have done anything very serious or criminal.

Kizzy 03-11-2017 07:13 PM

I wouldn't like to think that anyone would use such an important topic to score political points within the Labour ranks itself...but I can kind of see it happening :/

joeysteele 03-11-2017 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kizzy (Post 9679850)
I wouldn't like to think that anyone would use such an important topic to score political points within the Labour ranks itself...but I can kind of see it happening :/

The point is Kizzy, this is going to affect likely most parties.
All party leaders may havehad less than worthy people as their main spokesnen/women

This trial by media atmosphere now is really not that helpful.
If people have complaints of criminal intent as to real harassment,go to the police..

Party leaders cannot withhold advancement when no charges are against anyone.
That would be new discrimination.

I have no time for Theresa May, however here,she like Corbyn will likely get pilloried for not having perfect foresight,as to those they appoint or have relied on.
This is not either of their faults nor other party leaders.

If really serious incidents are fully proven and/or even prosecutions result then the fault lies with the accused at that time and for what they've done,no one else.

Brillopad 04-11-2017 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 9679673)

Got it in one. :hee:

jet 04-11-2017 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by parmnion (Post 9679673)

A hyopcrite? Yes, it many ways, dating from many years ago to the present day. He's despicable.

Brillopad 04-11-2017 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 9681447)
A hyopcrite? Yes, it many ways, dating from many years ago to the present day. He's despicable.

Good to see you jet. Welcome back.

Brillopad 05-11-2017 09:38 AM

He should do more to control the persistent gaffs of Diane Abbott who has now said ‘that as 16 year-olds can die for our country they should be able to vote’.

Fancy someone in her position not knowing the age at which our young men and women are allowed to risk their lives for their country - only a minor detail after all. I hope we never allow 16 year-old to do so - I think 18 is too young.

Talk about being so desperate to get the vote for 16 year-olds so Labour stand a chance of winning the next election she can’t even be bothered to get her facts right.

Vicky. 05-11-2017 09:47 AM

16 year olds can join the army can't they?

Anyway, yes Corbyn is a hypocrite on so many things tbh. I am going off him slowly, but I still think hes the best of a bad bunch. I have a huge issue with how he identifies a 'need' for 'woman only' carriages on trains, yet says a woman is 'anyone who identifies as a woman'(which makes no sense as a descriptor as its circular?) . So yeah, 'woman only' carriages filled with men, makes total sense :laugh:

I think dealing with those accused of stuff is a bit of a sensitive matter in general though. As the person might turn out to be innocent, and then if they are they have been penalized for nothing.

Brillopad 05-11-2017 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 9681824)
16 year olds can join the army can't they?

Anyway, yes Corbyn is a hypocrite on so many things tbh. I am going off him slowly, but I still think hes the best of a bad bunch. I have a huge issue with how he identifies a 'need' for 'woman only' carriages on trains, yet says a woman is 'anyone who identifies as a woman'(which makes no sense as a descriptor as its circular?) . So yeah, 'woman only' carriages filled with men, makes total sense :laugh:

I think dealing with those accused of stuff is a bit of a sensitive matter in general though. As the person might turn out to be innocent, and then if they are they have been penalized for nothing.

They can join, but they can’t partake in any combat situations until they are 18.

Beso 09-11-2017 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 9681447)
A hyopcrite? Yes, it many ways, dating from many years ago to the present day. He's despicable.

A very shady character indeed jet, nice to see you back again by the way

bots 09-11-2017 09:07 AM

I think Corbyn is a huge hypocrite, and he has been doing it for years.

I'm not a May fan, and she does change her tune from time to time, but i tend to think she is sincere when she talks on a subject. Corbyn on the other hand is unscrupulous , sneaky, and utterly untrustworthy

Livia 09-11-2017 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vicky. (Post 9681824)
16 year olds can join the army can't they?

Anyway, yes Corbyn is a hypocrite on so many things tbh. I am going off him slowly, but I still think hes the best of a bad bunch. I have a huge issue with how he identifies a 'need' for 'woman only' carriages on trains, yet says a woman is 'anyone who identifies as a woman'(which makes no sense as a descriptor as its circular?) . So yeah, 'woman only' carriages filled with men, makes total sense :laugh:

I think dealing with those accused of stuff is a bit of a sensitive matter in general though. As the person might turn out to be innocent, and then if they are they have been penalized for nothing.

They can join as apprentices. They are not allowed into a combat zone until they reach the age of majority - 18.

Livia 09-11-2017 09:47 AM

He's an anti-Semitic, self-promoting terrorist hugger. And he's not even the worst of them. We have a Marxist Shadow Chancellor and Diane Abbott who, if elected, will be responsible for our national security.

What worries me most is this: There is no longer a political party I would wish to vote for. And if it turns out Corbyn wins because no one else is even slightly electable, I am lucky that I don't have to stay.

jet 09-11-2017 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 9686648)
He's an anti-Semitic, self-promoting terrorist hugger. And he's not even the worst of them. We have a Marxist Shadow Chancellor and Diane Abbott who, if elected, will be responsible for our national security.

What worries me most is this: There is no longer a political party I would wish to vote for. And if it turns out Corbyn wins because no one else is even slightly electable, I am lucky that I don't have to stay.

It beats me how many are so ultra sensitive about issues like racism and yet turn a blind eye when it comes to Corbyn and many other members of the current Labour party's very dubious dealings and ideologies.
I guess they just agree with them or don't care? Otherwise why support the party?

DemolitionRed 09-11-2017 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Livia (Post 9686648)
He's an anti-Semitic, self-promoting terrorist hugger. And he's not even the worst of them. We have a Marxist Shadow Chancellor and Diane Abbott who, if elected, will be responsible for our national security.

What worries me most is this: There is no longer a political party I would wish to vote for. And if it turns out Corbyn wins because no one else is even slightly electable, I am lucky that I don't have to stay.

He's anti-Zionist and Zionism is not a surrogate to Judaism.

jet 09-11-2017 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bitontheslide (Post 9686622)
I think Corbyn is a huge hypocrite, and he has been doing it for years.

I'm not a May fan, and she does change her tune from time to time, but i tend to think she is sincere when she talks on a subject. Corbyn on the other hand is unscrupulous , sneaky, and utterly untrustworthy

I couldn't agree more.

DemolitionRed 09-11-2017 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jet (Post 9686912)
It beats me how many are so ultra sensitive about issues like racism and yet turn a blind eye when it comes to Corbyn and many other members of the current Labour party's very dubious dealings and ideologies.
I guess they just agree with them or don't care? Otherwise why support the party?

If I believed Jezza had an ounce of racism in him, I would be the first to demonize him. You can't be anti-racist and support a racist; its not ethically possible.

What is Jezza racist about?

jet 09-11-2017 03:28 PM

a
Quote:

Originally Posted by DemolitionRed (Post 9686920)
If I believed Jezza had an ounce of racism in him, I would be the first to demonize him. You can't be anti-racist and support a racist; its not ethically possible.

What is Jezza racist about?

I gave racism as an example of how ultra - sensitive some people can be about certain issues, yet conveniently ignore other, just as important issues like anti - Semitism and terrorist sympathising.
I personally can't understand how one issue riles up so many, yet other issues are tolerated so readily to the extent that they vote for a man who, as Olivia described well, is a 'terrorist hugger', and a party with vocal anti - semitic's among their ranks.

DemolitionRed 09-11-2017 03:34 PM

I spent months on here talking about Corbyn and his none relationship with terrorism and I'm not about to go through all that again.

You say he's anti-Jewish? Where did you get this idea from?

DemolitionRed 09-11-2017 03:37 PM

And btw, my father-in-law is an anti-Zionist, atheist Jew!


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.